Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T15:26:25.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dimensions of experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

P. McC. Miller and
J. G. Ingham
P. McC. Miller*
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Unit for Epidemiological Studies in Psychiatry, University Department of Psychiatry, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh
J. G. Ingham
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Unit for Epidemiological Studies in Psychiatry, University Department of Psychiatry, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh
*
1Dr P. McC. Miller, MRC Epidemiology Unit, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Morningside Park, Edinburgh EH10 5HF.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Life-event data for a 3-month period were collected for 1058 adults. Six ways of categorizing life events and difficulties were analysed: namely, loss (L), threat (T), anti-social act (A), hopeless situation (H), uncertainty of outcome (U), and choice of action (C). Reliabilities were moderate to good. The number and the pattern of characteristics within a single event or difficulty were found to be the most important elements in predicting a depression score criterion. Two patterns were particularly predictive: CH present in an event or difficulty, and LH present with U absent. Approximately 21·9% of the depression score variance maybe explained using life events together with the respondent's social class, sex and social support. This represents a significant improvement over prediction based solely on the scoring methods of Brown & Harris (1978).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , May 1983, pp. 417 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Brown, G. W. & Harris, T. (1978). The Social Origins of Depression. Tavistock: London.Google ScholarPubMed
Brown, G. W. & Harris, T. (1981). Bulletin for Users of the Bedford College Life-Events Instrument. Bedford College: London.Google Scholar
Epstein, S. (1978). Avoidance–approach: the fifth basic conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 46, 1016–1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finlay-Jones, R. A. & Brown, G. W. (1981). Types of stressful life event and the onset of anxiety and depressive disorders. Psychological Medicine 11, 803–816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, T. H. & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 11, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingham, J. G. & Miller, P. McC. (1979). Symptom prevalence and severity in a general practice population. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 33, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, A. E. (1977). Coefficients of agreement between observers and their interpretation. British Journal of Psychiatry 130, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paykel, E. S., Myers, J. K., Dienelt, M. N., Klerman, G. L., Lindenthal, J. J. & Pepper, M. P. (1969). Life events and depression – a controlled study. Archives of General Psychiatry 21, 753–760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabkin, J. G. & Struening, E. L. (1976). Life events, stress and illness. Science 194, 1013–1020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surtees, P. G. & Ingham, J. G. (1980). Life stress and depressive outcome: application of a dissipation model to life events. Social Psychiatry 15, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennant, C., Bebbington, P. E. & Hurry, J. (1981). The short term outcome of neurotic disorders in the community: the relation of remission to clinical factors and to ‘neutralising’ life events. British Journal of Psychiatry 139, 213–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Totman, R. (1979). What makes life events stressful? A retrospective study of patients who have suffered a first myocardial infarction. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 23, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed