Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T21:33:41.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Executive function in Tourette's syndrome and obsessive–compulsive disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2004

LAURA H. WATKINS
Affiliation:
MRC Cambridge Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
BARBARA J. SAHAKIAN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
MARY M. ROBERTSON
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Royal Free and University College School of Medicine, University of London; UK
DAVID M. VEALE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Royal Free and University College School of Medicine, University of London; UK
ROBERT D. ROGERS
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
KATHRYN M. PICKARD
Affiliation:
MRC Cambridge Centre for Brain Repair, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
MICHAEL R. F. AITKEN
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
TREVOR W. ROBBINS
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Background. Cognitive performance was compared in the genetically and neurobiologically related disorders of Tourette's syndrome (TS) and obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), in three domains of executive function: planning, decision-making and inhibitory response control.

Method. Twenty TS patients, twenty OCD patients and a group of age- and IQ-matched normal controls completed psychometric and computerized cognitive tests and psychiatric rating scales. The cognitive tests were well-characterized in terms of their sensitivity to other fronto-striatal disorders, and included pattern and spatial recognition memory, attentional set-shifting, and a Go/No-go set-shifting task, planning, and decision-making.

Results. Compared to controls, OCD patients showed selective deficits in pattern recognition memory and slower responding in both pattern and spatial recognition, impaired extra-dimensional shifting on the set-shifting test and impaired reversal of response set on the Go/No-go test. In contrast, TS patients were impaired in spatial recognition memory, extra-dimensional set-shifting, and decision-making. Neither group was impaired in planning. Direct comparisons between the TS and OCD groups revealed significantly different greater deficits for recognition memory latency and Go/No-go reversal for the OCD group, and quality of decision-making for the TS group.

Conclusions. TS and OCD show both differences (recognition memory, decision-making) and similarities (set-shifting) in selective profiles of cognitive function. Specific set-shifting deficits in the OCD group contrasted with their intact performance on other tests of executive function, such as planning and decision-making, and suggested only limited involvement of frontal lobe dysfunction, possibly consistent with OCD symptomatology.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press