Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-cbk24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T15:19:26.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A multicentre inter-rater reliability study using the OPCRIT computerized diagnostic system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

J. Williams,
A. E. Farmer,
M. Ackenheil,
C. A. Kaufmann and
P. McGuffin
J. Williams*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff; Nerverenklinik, Universität München, Germany; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
A. E. Farmer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff; Nerverenklinik, Universität München, Germany; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
M. Ackenheil
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff; Nerverenklinik, Universität München, Germany; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
C. A. Kaufmann
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff; Nerverenklinik, Universität München, Germany; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
P. McGuffin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff; Nerverenklinik, Universität München, Germany; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr J. Williams, Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XN.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

We examined the reliability of the OPCRIT system from ratings produced by 30 USA and European clinicians involved in molecular genetic research. The OPCRIT system facilitates a polydiagnostic approach to research on severe psychiatric disorders. OPCRIT comprises a 90-item checklist of signs and symptoms and a suite of computer programs, which together generate diagnoses according to the operational criteria of 12 major classificatory systems (e.g. DSM-III, DSM-III-R, RDC, ICD-10). Thirty summaries of actual cases ranging in signs and symptoms, taken from independent sources, were rated by participants from research centres across Europe and the USA using the OPCRIT system. Each rating was then compared to a standard rating using a kappa statistic. Good levels of reliability were observed within all classifications (e.g. DSM-III-R, kappa = 0·73, RDC, kappa = 0·71; ICD-10, kappa = 0·70) and a similar pattern of ratings was found in both the European and USA samples. We conclude that the OPCRIT system, is both flexible and practicable retaining the ‘top-down’ advantage of operational definitions as well as the ‘bottom-up’ potential offered by well defined signs, symptoms and other component items. Within the limitations of an international, multicentre design this study shows that the OPCRIT system affords good reliability with raters from a variety of geographical and theoretical backgrounds.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , July 1996, pp. 775 - 783
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association, Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-III) 3rd edn, APA: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III-R) 3rd edn, Revised. APA: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) 4th edn. APA: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Brockington, I. F., Kendell, R. E. & Leff, J. P. (1978). Definitions of schizophrenia: concordance and prediction of outcome. Psychological Medicine 8, 387–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, W. T., Bartko, J. J., Carpenter, C. L. & Strauss, J. S. (1976). Another view of schizophrenia subtypes. A report from the International Pilot Study of Schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 33, 508–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castle, D., Wessely, S., Der, G. & Murray, R. M. (1991). The incidence of operationally defined schizophrenia in Camberwell. British Journal of Psychiatry 159, 790–794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crow, J. J. (1980). The molecular pathology of schizophrenia: more than one disease process? British Medical Journal 280, 66–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmer, A. E. & Williams, J. (1994). Defining the phenotype of molecular genetic research of psychotic illness. In Psychiatry in Europe: Directions and Developments (ed. Sensky, T., Katona, C. and Montgomery, S.), pp. 26–34. Gaskell: London.Google Scholar
Farmer, A. E., McGuffin, P. & Spitznagel, L. (1983). Heterogeneity in schizophrenia: a cluster analytic approach. Psychiatry Research 8, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmer, A. E., McGuffin, P. & Bebbington, P. (1988). The phenomenon of schizophrenia. In Schizophrenia The Major Issues (ed. Bebbington, P. and McGuffin, P.), pp. 36–50. Heinemann: London.Google Scholar
Farmer, A. E., Jones, I., Williams, J. & McGuffin, P. (1993 a). Defining schizophrenia: operational criteria. Journal of Mental Health 2, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, A. E., Cosyns, P., Leboyer, M., Maier, W., Mors, O., Sargeant, M., Bebbington, P. & McGuffin, P. (1993 b). A SCAN-SADS comparison study of psychotic subjects and their first-degree relatives. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 242, 352–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feighner, J. P., Robins, E., Guze, S. B., Woodruffe, R. A., Winokur, G. & Munoz, R. (1972). Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Archives of General Psychiatry 26, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaspers, K. (1963). General Psychopathology. Manchester University Press: Manchester.Google Scholar
Kendell, R. E. (1975). The Role of Diagnosis in Psychiatry. Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford.Google Scholar
Kendell, R. E., Malcolm, D. E. & Adams, W. (1993). The problem of detecting changes in the incidence of schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry 162, 212–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leboyer, M. & McGuffin, P. (1991). Collaborative strategies in the molecular genetics of the major psychoses. British Journal of Psychiatry 158, 605–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuffin, P., Festenstein, H. & Murray, R. M. (1983). A family study of HLA antigens and other genetic markers in schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine 13, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuffin, P., Farmer, A. E. & Harvey, I. (1991). A polydiagnostic application of operational criteria in studies of psychotic illness. Development and reliability of the OPCRIT system. Archives of General Psychiatry 48, 764–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nurnberger, J. I., Blehar, M. C., Kaufmann, C. A., York-Cooler, C., Simpson, S. G., Harkavy-Friedman, J., Severe, J. B., Malaspina, D. & Reich, T. (1994). Diagnostic interview for genetic studies. Archives of General Psychiatry 51, 849–859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, M. & McGuffin, P. (1993). Association and linkage: complementary strategies for complex disorder. Journal of Medical Genetics 30, 638–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pull, M. C., Pull, C. B. & Pichot, P. (1987). Des criteres empiriques francois paur ler psychoses II. Consensus des psychiatres francais et definitions provisoires. L'Encephale XIII, 53–57.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. (1959). Clinical Psychopathology.(Translated by Hamilton, M..) Grune and Stratton Inc.: New York.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L., Endicott, J. & Robins, E. (1975). Research Diagnostic Criteria. Instrument No. 58. New York State Psychiatric Institute: New York.Google ScholarPubMed
Spitznagel, E. L. & Helzer, J. E. (1985). A proposed solution to the base rate problem in the kappa statistic. Archives of General Psychiatry 42, 725–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. A. & Abrams, R. (1978). The prevalence of schizophrenia: a reassessment using modern diagnostic criteria. American Journal of Psychiatry 135, 945–948.Google ScholarPubMed
Tsuang, M. T. & Winokur, G. (1974). Criteria for subtyping schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 31, 43–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J., Farmer, A. E., Wessely, S., Castle, D. J. & McGuffin, P. (1993). Heterogeneity in schizophrenia: an extended replication of the hebephrenic-like and paranoid-like subtypes. Psychiatric Research 49, 199–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Diagnostic Criteria for Research. World Health Organization: Geneva.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (1994). Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. World Health Organization: Geneva.Google Scholar