Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T07:37:45.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The reliability of diagnostic coding in psychiatric case registers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

S. Sytema,
R. Giel,
G. H. M. M. Ten Horn,
M. Balestrieri and
N. Davies
S. Sytema*
Affiliation:
Afdeling Sociale Psychiatrie, Rijks Universiteit Groningen, The Netherlands; Cattedra e Servizio di Psicologia Medica, Istituto di Psichiatria, Universita di Verona, Italy; Department of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham
R. Giel
Affiliation:
Afdeling Sociale Psychiatrie, Rijks Universiteit Groningen, The Netherlands; Cattedra e Servizio di Psicologia Medica, Istituto di Psichiatria, Universita di Verona, Italy; Department of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham
G. H. M. M. Ten Horn
Affiliation:
Afdeling Sociale Psychiatrie, Rijks Universiteit Groningen, The Netherlands; Cattedra e Servizio di Psicologia Medica, Istituto di Psichiatria, Universita di Verona, Italy; Department of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham
M. Balestrieri
Affiliation:
Afdeling Sociale Psychiatrie, Rijks Universiteit Groningen, The Netherlands; Cattedra e Servizio di Psicologia Medica, Istituto di Psichiatria, Universita di Verona, Italy; Department of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham
N. Davies
Affiliation:
Afdeling Sociale Psychiatrie, Rijks Universiteit Groningen, The Netherlands; Cattedra e Servizio di Psicologia Medica, Istituto di Psichiatria, Universita di Verona, Italy; Department of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham
*
1Address for correspondence. Dr S. Sytema, Academisch Ziekenhuis Groningen, Psychiatrische Universiteitskliniek. Afdeling Sociale Psychiatrie. Postbus 30001. 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

In total, 103 cases were randomly selected from the Groningen, Nottingham and South Verona registers. Six raters (two in each of the register areas) were involved in coding these cases according to the ICD–9. In general, interrater agreement was satisfactory when codes were grouped into a limited number of categories. Nevertheless, considerable variation in agreement rates was found. We distinguished three steps in the diagnostic process. The selected logistic model showed that reliability is significantly affected in each step, but only substantial in the first where clinicians formulate a diagnosis.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , November 1989, pp. 999 - 1006
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bishop, Y. M M., Fienberg, S. E & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis Theory and Practice. MIT Press: Cambridge. MassGoogle Scholar
Fienberg, S E. (1980) The Analysis of Cross-Classified Categorical Data MIT Press: Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
Giel, R & Bogaarts, F. (1980). Diagnostische classificatie en codering in de psychiatric Tijdschrift voor Psychialrie 22, 327–335.Google Scholar
Giel, R. & Horn, G. H. M. M. ten (1982). Patterns of mental health care in a Dutch register area. Social Psychiatry 19, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HornG, H. M. M. ten G, H. M. M. ten (1983). Psychiatric Case Registers, Report on a WHO Working Group. World Health Organization: Mannheim, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
HornG, H. M. M. ten. G, H. M. M. ten. (1986). Definitions and classifications: introduction. In Psychiatric Case Registers in Public Health. A Worldwide Inventory 1960–1985 (ed. Horn, G. H M. M. ten, Giel, R., Gulbinat, W. H and Henderson, J. H.), pp. 170–174. Elsevier: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hubert, L. J. (1977). Kappa revisited. Psychological Bulletin 84, 289–297.Google Scholar
Jennings, C. & Bank, R (1986). The use of computers by psychiatric case registers: a survey. In Psychiatric Case Registers in Public Health. A Worldwide Inventory 1960–1985 (ed. Giel, R., Gulbinat, W. H. and Henderson, J. H.), pp. 325–337. Elsevier: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Jones, S. J., Cooper, J. E. & Davis, N. (1986). Diagnostic validity and comparability of register data. In Psychiatric Case Registers in Public Health. A Worldwide Inventory 1960–1985 (ed. Giel, R., Gulbinat, W. H. and Henderson, J. H.), pp. 175–178. Elsevier: AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159–174.Google Scholar
MacMillan, D. (1970). The functions of the Nottingham register. In Psychiatric Case Registers (ed, Wing, J. K. and Bransby, E. R.), pp. 15–19. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Reynolds, H. T. (1977). The Analysis of Cross-Classifications. The Free Press: New York.Google Scholar
Saugstad, L. & Odegard, O. (1985). In defence of international classification Psychological Medicine 15, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tansella, M., Faccincani, C., Mignolli, G., Balestrieri, M. & Zimmermann-Tansella, Ch (1985). II Registro psichiatrico di Verona Sud. Epidemiologia per la valutazione dei nuovi servizi territoriali In L'Approccio Epidemiologico in Psichiatria (ed. Tansella, M.), pp. 225–259Boringhieri: TorinoGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (1978). Mental Disorders-Glossary and Guide to their Classification in Accordance with the Ninth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases. WHO: Geneva.Google Scholar