Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T06:56:23.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Contributions to Efficient Statistics in Structural Models: Specification and Estimation of Moment Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

P. M. Bentler
P. M. Bentler*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
*
Address reprint requests to P. M. Bentler, Department of Psychology, Franz Hall, University of California, Los Angeles, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Current practice in structural modeling of observed continuous random variables is limited to representation systems for first and second moments (e.g., means and covariances), and to distribution theory based on multivariate normality. In psychometrics the multinormality assumption is often incorrect, so that statistical tests on parameters, or model goodness of fit, will frequently be incorrect as well. It is shown that higher order product moments yield important structural information when the distribution of variables is arbitrary. Structural representations are developed for generalizations of the Bentler-Weeks, Jöreskog-Keesling-Wiley, and factor analytic models. Some asymptotically distribution-free efficient estimators for such arbitrary structural models are developed. Limited information estimators are obtained as well. The special case of elliptical distributions that allow nonzero but equal kurtoses for variables is discussed in some detail. The argument is made that multivariate normal theory for covariance structure models should be abandoned in favor of elliptical theory, which is only slightly more difficult to apply in practice but specializes to the traditional case when normality holds. Many open research areas are described.

Keywords

structural equationscovariance structuresmoment structureserrors in variablesfactor analysisminimum chi squaregeneralized least squareselliptical distributionsasymptotically distribution free

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , December 1983, pp. 493 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Presidential Address to the Psychometric Society, delivered at the annual meeting in Los Angeles, June 1983, and at the third European meetings in Jouy-en-Josas, France, July 1983. The research reported here was supported in part by USPHS grants DA00017 and DA01070. The ideas developed in this paper were favorably influenced by a number of visitors to UCLA, especially M. W. Browne, T. Dijkstra, and A. Mooijaart, by colleagues at UCLA, especially M. L. Brecht, G. J. Huba, R. I. Jennrich, and J. A. Woodward, and by graduate students in mathematics, engineering, and psychology, especially M. Berkane, D. G. Bonett, P. Leung, A. Mouawad, and J. S. Tanaka. The assistance of S. Luong in manuscript production is also acknowledged.

References

Aigner, D. J., & Goldberger, A. S. Latent variables in socioeconomic models, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1977.Google Scholar
Aigner, D. J., Hsiao, C., Kapteyn, A., & Wansbeek, T. Latent variable models in econometrics. In Griliches, Z., & Intriligator, M. D. (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1983.Google Scholar
Akahira, M., & Takeuchi, K. Asymptotic efficiency of statistical estimators: Concepts and higher order asymptotic efficiency, New York: Springer, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P. Causal models in marketing, New York: Wiley, 1980.Google Scholar
Barankin, E. W., & Gurland, J. On asymptotically normal, efficient estimators. University of California Publications in Statistics, 1951, 1, 89–130.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, D. J. Latent variable models for ordered categorical data. Journal of Econometrics, 1983, 22, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M. Multistructure statistical model applied to factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1976, 11, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentler, P. M. Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 1980, 31, 419–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M. Linear systems with multiple levels and types of latent variables. In Jöreskog, K. G., & Wold, H. (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction. Part I . Amsterdam: North-Holland (a). 1982, 101–130.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. Confirmatory factor analysis via noniterative estimation: A fast, inexpensive method. Journal of Marketing Research, 1982, 19, 417–424 (b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M. Simultaneous equations as moment structure models: With an introduction to latent variable models. Journal of Econometrics, 1983, 22, 13–42 (a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M. The EQS approach to structural equation models for normal and nonnormal continuous variables. In Möbus, C., & Schneider, W. (Eds.), Kausalmodelle in den Sozialwissenschaften—zur Analyse von Längschnitt und experimentellen Daten mit LISREL und verwandten Methoden, Bern, Switzerland: Huber (b), 1983.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. Theory and implementation of EQS, a structural equations program. Technical Report, BMDP Statistical Software, 1983. (c)Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88, 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Dijkstra, T. Efficient estimation via linearization in structural models. In Krishnaiah, P. R. (Eds.), Multivariate analysis VI, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1983.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Lee, S. Y. Matrix derivatives with chain rule and rules for simple, Hadamard, and Kronecker products. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1978, 17, 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Lee, S. Y. A statistical development of three-mode factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1979, 32, 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Lee, S. Y. Covariance structures under polynomial constraints: Applications to correlation and alpha-type structural models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1983, 8, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Peeler, W. H. Models of female orgasm. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1979, 8, 405–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentler, P. M., & Speckart, G. Models of attitude-behavior relations. Psychological Review, 1979, 86, 452–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Speckart, G. Attitudes “cause” behaviors: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 40, 226–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. Interrelations among models for the analysis of moment structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1979, 14, 169–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. Linear structural equations with latnet variables. Psychometrika, 1980, 45, 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Weeks, D. G. Multivariate analysis with latent variables. In Krishnaiah, P. R., & Kanal, L. (Eds.), Handbook of statistics, Vol. 2 . Amerdam: North-Holland. 1982, 747–771.Google Scholar
Beran, R. Testing for ellipsoidal symmetry of a multivariate density. The Annals of Statistics, 1979, 7, 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkson, J. Minimum chi-square, not maximum likelihood!. The Annals of Statistics, 1980, 8, 457–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boomsma, A. On the robustness of LISREL (maximum likelihood estimation) against small sample size and nonnormality, Groningen: University of Groningen, 1983.Google Scholar
Browne, M. W. Generalized least squares estimators in the analysis of covariance structures. South African Statistical Journal, 1974, 8, 1–24.Google Scholar
Browne, M. W. Covariance structures. In Hawkins, D. M. (Eds.), Topics in applied multivariate analysis . London: Cambridge University Press. 1982, 72–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, M. W. The decomposition of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Research Report 83/2. Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of South Africa, 1983.Google Scholar
Cambanis, S., & Huang, S., Simons, G. On the theory of elliptically contoured distributions. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 1981, 11, 368–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chmielewski, M. A. Elliptically symmetric distributions: A review and bibliography. International Statistical Review, 1981, 49, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, M. B. Bi-variate k-statistics and cumulants of their joint sampling distribution. Biometrika, 1951, 38, 179–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Leeuw, J. Models and methods for the analysis of correlation coefficients. Journal of Econometrics, 1983, 22, 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. Iteratively reweighted least squares for linear regression when errors are normal/independent distributed. In Krishnaiah, P. R. (Eds.), Multivariate Analysis-V . Amsterdam: North-Holland. 1980, 35–57.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T. Latent variables in linear stochastic models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen, 1981.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T. Some comments on maximum likelihood and partial least squares methods. Journal of Econometrics, 1983, 22, 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, O. D. Introduction to structural equation models, New York: Academic, 1975.Google Scholar
DuToit, S. H. C. The Analysis of growth curves. Ph.D. Thesis, University of South Africa, 1979.Google Scholar
Efron, B. The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans, Philadelphia: SIAM, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, C., & Krishnaiah, P. R. Asymptotic distributions of functions of the eigenvalues of some random matrices for nonnormal populations. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 1982, 12, 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, T. S. A method of generating best asymptotically normal estimates with application to the estimation of bacterial densities. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1958, 29, 1046–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hägglund, G. Factor analysis by instrumental variables methods. Psychometrika, 1982, 47, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, H. O., Booker, A. Nonlinear least squares estimation. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1965, 36, 638–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huba, G. J., & Bentler, P. M. A developmental theory of drug use: Derivation and assessment of a causal modeling approach. In Baltes, P. B., Brim, O. G. Jr. (Eds.), Lifespan development and behavior, Vol. 4 . New York: Academic (a). 1982, 147–203.Google Scholar
Huba, G. J., Bentler, P. M. On the usefulness of latent variable causal modeling in testing theories of naturally occurring events (including adolescent drug use): A rejoinder to Martin. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 43, 604–611 (b).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huba, G. J., & Bentler, P. M. Causal models of the development of law abidance and its relationship to psychosocial factors and drug use. In Laufer, W. S., & Day, J. M. (Eds.), Personality theory, moral development, and criminal behavior . Lexington, Mass.: Heath (a). 1983, 165–215.Google Scholar
Huba, G. J., & Bentler, P. M. Test of a drug use causal model using asymptotically distribution-free methods. Journal of Drug Education, 1983, 13, 3–14 (b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huba, G. J., & Bentler, P. M. Antecedents and consequences of adolescent drug use: A psychosocial study of development using a causal modeling approach, New York: Plenum, 1984.Google Scholar
Hsu, P. L. The limiting distribution of functions of sample means and applications to testing hypotheses. Proceedings of the First Berkeley Symposium in Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1949. Pp. 359–402.Google Scholar
Ibragimov, I. A., & Has'minskii, R. Z. Statistical estimation: Asymptotic theory, New York: Springer, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, L. R., & Mulaik, S. A., Brett, J. M. Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data, Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982.Google Scholar
Jennrich, R. I., & Moore, R. H. Maximum likelihood estimation by means of nonlinear least squares. Proceedings of ASA: Statistical Computing, 1975, 57–65.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 1978, 43, 443–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., & Goldberger, A. S. Factor analysis by generalized least squares. Psychometrika, 1972, 37, 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. LISREL V user's guide, Chicago: International Educational Services, 1981.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, B. Maximum likelihood estimation and large sample inference for generalized linear and nonlinear regression models. Biometrika, 1983, 70, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, A. M., & Linnik, Y. V., Rao, C. R. Characterization problems in mathematical statistics, New York: Wiley, 1973.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. L. Tensor notation and the sampling cumulants of k-statistics. Biometrika, 1952, 39, 319–323.Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y., & Bentler, P. M. Some asymptotic properties of constrained generalized least squares estimation in covariance structure models. South African Statistical Journal, 1980, 14, 121–136.Google Scholar
Lee, S. Y., & Jennrich, R. I. A study of algorithms for covariance structure analysis with specific comparisons using factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1979, 44, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, E. L. Theory of point estimation, New York: Wiley, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddala, G. S. Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinvaud, E. Statistical methods of econometrics, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1980.Google Scholar
Manski, C. F., & McFadden, D. Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Mardia, K. V. Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 1970, 57, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardia, K. V. Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhya, 1974, B36, 115–128.Google Scholar
McCullagh, P. Quasi-likelihood functions. The Annals of Statistics, 1983, 11, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R. P. A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1978, 31, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooijaart, A. Factor analysis for non-normal variables. Technical report, Department of Psychology, UCLA, December 1982.Google Scholar
Moore, D. S., & Stubblebine, J. B. Chi-square tests for multivariate normality with application to common stock prices. Communications in Statistics-Theory & Methods, 1981, A10, 713–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muirhead, R. J. Aspects of multivariate statistical theory, New York: Wiley, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muirhead, R. J., & Waternaux, C. M. Asymptotic distributions in canonical correlation analysis and other multivariate procedures for nonnormal populations. Biometrika, 1980, 67, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, B. Latent variable structural equation modeling with categorical data. Journal of Econometrics, 1983, 22, 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nel, D. G. On matrix differentition in statistics. South African Statistical Journal, 1980, 14, 137–193.Google Scholar
Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. Dimensions of subjective female orgasmic responsiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 862–873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neyman, J. Contributions to the theory of the χ 2 test. Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability . Berkeley: University of California. 1949, 239–273.Google Scholar
Pal, M. Consistent moment estimators of regression coefficients in the presence of errors in variables. Journal of Econometrics, 1980, 14, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parr, W. C. Minimum distance estimation: A bibliography. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 1981, A10, 1205–1224.Google Scholar
Pfanzagl, J. Further results on asymptotic normality I. Metrika, 1972, 18, 174–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfanzagl, J. Contributions to a general asymptotic statistical theory, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P. C. B. The iterated minimum distance estimator and the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator. Econometrica, 1976, 44, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R. Characterization of the distribution of random variables in linear structural relations. Sankhya, 1966, 28A, 251–260.Google Scholar
Rao, C. R. Linear statistical inference and its applications, New York: Wiley, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiersøl, O. Identifiability of a linear relation between variables which are subject to error. Econometrica, 1950, 18, 375–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg, T. J. Approximating the distributions of econometric estimators and test statistics. In Griliches, Z., Intriligator, M. D. (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1983.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, T. J., & Leenders, C. T. Efficient estimation of simultaneous equation systems. Econometrica, 1964, 32, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwager, S. J., & Margolin, B. H. Detection of multivariate normal outliers. The Annals of Statistics, 1982, 10, 943–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, A. Asymptotic distribution theory in the analysis of covariance structures. South African Statistical Journal, 1983, 17, 33–81.Google Scholar
Sieber, M., & Bentler, P. M. Kausalmodelle zur Persönlichkeit und dem späteren Konsum legaler und illegaler Drogen. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Ihre Anwendungen, 1982, 41, 1–15.Google Scholar
Sörbom, D. Structural equation models with structured means. In Jöreskog, K. G., & Wold, H. (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction. I . Amsterdam: North-Holland. 1982, 183–195.Google Scholar
Spearman, C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 1904, 15, 72–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speckart, G., & Bentler, P. M. Application of attitude-behavior models to varied content domains. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 1982, 4, 453–466.Google Scholar
Steiger, J. H., & Hakstian, A. R. The asymptotic distribution of elements of a correlation matrix: Theory and application. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1982, 35, 208–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, J. S. Some results on the estimation of covariance structure models, Los Angeles: University of California, 1983.Google Scholar
Van Praag, B. M. S., Dijkstra, T. K., & Van Velzen, J. Least squares theory based on general distributional assumptions with an application to the incomplete observations problem. Technical Report 83.09, Leyden University, 1983.Google Scholar
Wald, A. Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 1943, 54, 426–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedderburn, R. W. M. Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss-Newton method. Biometrika, 1974, 61, 439–447.Google Scholar
Wiley, D. E. The identification problem for structural equation models with unmeasured variables. In Goldberger, A. S., & Duncan, O. D. (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences . New York: Academic. 1973, 69–83.Google Scholar