Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:52:02.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of the Bootstrap Methods in Factor Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Masanori Ichikawa  and
Sadanori Konishi
Masanori Ichikawa*
Affiliation:
Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
Sadanori Konishi
Affiliation:
Graduate School Department of Mathematics, Kyushu University
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Masanori Ichikawa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, 4-51-21 Nishi-ga-Hara, Kita-Ku, Tokyo 114, JAPAN.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A Monte Carlo experiment is conducted to investigate the performance of the bootstrap methods in normal theory maximum likelihood factor analysis both when the distributional assumption is satisfied and unsatisfied. The parameters and their functions of interest include unrotated loadings, analytically rotated loadings, and unique variances. The results reveal that (a) bootstrap bias estimation performs sometimes poorly for factor loadings and nonstandardized unique variances; (b) bootstrap variance estimation performs well even when the distributional assumption is violated; (c) bootstrap confidence intervals based on the Studentized statistics are recommended; (d) if structural hypothesis about the population covariance matrix is taken into account then the bootstrap distribution of the normal theory likelihood ratio test statistic is close to the corresponding sampling distribution with slightly heavier right tail.

Keywords

factor analysisbootstrapmaximum likelihoodlikelihood ratio test statisticconfidence intervalMonte Carlo experiment

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 77 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This study was carried out in part under the ISM cooperative research program (91-ISM · CRP-85, 92-ISM · CRP-102). The authors would like to thank the editor and three reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions which improved the quality of this paper considerably.

References

Anderson, T. W., Rubin, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factor analysis. Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 5, 111–150.Google Scholar
Beran, R., Srivastava, M. S. (1985). Bootstrap tests and confidence regions for functions of a covariance matrix. The Annals of Statistics, 13, 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, K. A., Stine, R. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. In Clogg, C. C. (Eds.), Sociological methodology 1990 (pp. 115–140). Oxford: Basil-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bollen, K. A., Stine, R. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatterjee, S. (1984). Variance estimation in factor analysis: An application of the bootstrap. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 252–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. R. B. (1970). A rapidly convergent method for maximum-likelihood factor analysis. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, D. B. (1979). Estimating the standard errors of rotated factor loadings by jackknifing. Psychometrika, 44, 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiCiccio, T. J., Romano, J. P. (1988). A review of bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 50, 338–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. The Annals of Statistics, 7, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B. (1982). The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans, Philadelphia: SIAM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmett, W. G. (1949). Factor analysis by Lawley's method of maximum likelihood. British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section, 2, 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fushimi, M. (1989). Ransuu [Random number], Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (1988). Theoretical comparison of bootstrap confidence intervals (with discussion). The Annals of Statistics, 16, 927–985.Google Scholar
Hall, P. (1992). The bootstrap and Edgeworth expansion, New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkley, D. V. (1988). Bootstrap methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 50, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennrich, R. I. (1973). On the stability of rotated factor loadings: The Wexler phenomenon. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 26, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennrich, R. I. (1974). Simplified formulae for standard errors in maximum-likelihood factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennrich, R. I., Robinson, S. M. (1969). A Newton-Raphson algorithm for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34, 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennrich, R. I., Thayer, D. T. (1973). A note on Lawley's formulas for standard errors in maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konishi, S. (1981). Normalizing transformations of some statistics in multivariate analysis. Biometrika, 68, 647–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konishi, S. (1991). Normalizing transformations and bootstrap confidence intervals. The Annals of Statistics, 19, 2209–2225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Z. V., Wildt, A. R., Durand, R. M. (1991). Approximating confidence intervals for factor loadings. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 421–434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawley, D. N. (1967). Some new results in maximum likelihood factor analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, A67, 256–264.Google Scholar
Lawley, D. N., Maxwell, A. E. (1971). Factor analysis as a statistical method 2nd ed.,, London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Léger, C., Politis, D. N., Romano, J. P. (1992). Bootstrap technology and applications. Technometrics, 34, 378–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muirhead, R. J. (1982). Aspects of multivariate statistical theory, New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, A., Browne, M. W. (1987). Analysis of covariance structures under elliptical distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 1092–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanepoel, J. W. H. (1990). A review of bootstrap methods. South African Statistical Journal, 24, 1–34.Google Scholar
van Driel, O. P. (1978). On various causes of improper solutions in maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 43, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar