Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:12:20.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comments on “the Measurement of Factorial Indeterminacy”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Stanley A. Mulaik
Stanley A. Mulaik*
Affiliation:
Georgia Institute of Technology
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Dr. Stanley A. Mulaik, School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Guttman’s index of indeterminacy (2ρ2 − 1) measures the potential amount of uncertainty in picking the right alternative interpretation for a factor. When alternative solutions for a factor are equally likely to be correct, then the squared multiple correlation ρ2 for predicting the factor from the observed variables is the average correlation ρAB between independently selected alternative solutions A and B, while var (ρAB) = (1 − ρ2)2/s, where s is the dimensionality of the space in which unpredicted components of alternative solutions are to be found. When alternative solutions for the factor are not equally likely to be chosen, ρ2 is the lower bound for E(ρAB); however, E(ρAB) need not be a modal value in the distribution of ρAB. Guttman’s index and E(ρAB) measure different aspects of the same indeterminacy problem.

Keywords

factor analysisfactor scoresinterpretation of factorsidentifiability

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , June 1976, pp. 249 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Dodson, E. O. Genetics: The modern side of heredity, 1956, Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Falmagne, J. C. Foundations of Fechnerian psychophysics. In Krantz, D. H., Atkinson, R. C., Luce, R. D., and Suppes, P. (Eds.), Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. II), 1974, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. The determinacy of factor score matrices with implications for five other basic problems of common-factor theory. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1955, 8, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R. P. The measurement of factor indeterminacy. Psychometrika, 1974, 30, 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulaik, S. A. The foundations of factor analysis, 1972, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mulaik, S. A. Confirmatory factor analysis. In Amick, D. J. and Walberg, H. J. (Eds.), Introductory multivariate statistics: applications in psychology, education and the social sciences, 1975, Berkeley, California: McCutchan.Google Scholar
Selby, S. M. Standard mathematical tables, 1971, Cleveland, Ohio: The Chemical Rubber Co..Google Scholar
Sommerville, D. M. Y. An introduction to the geometry of n dimensions, 1958, New York: Dover Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
Thomson, G. H. A hierarchy without a general factor. British Journal of Psychology, 1916, 8, 271–281.Google Scholar