Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T22:37:20.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Study of Three Methods of Rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Benjamin Fruchter and
Edwin Novak
Benjamin Fruchter
Affiliation:
University of Texas
Edwin Novak
Affiliation:
Systems Development Corp.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three methods of rotation (the graphical, the Thurstone analytical, and the direct-rotational) were applied to the matrix of centroid loadings for 35 variables, to determine which method is the most efficient from theoretical and practical standpoints. The direct-rotational method provided the most information for determining the rank of the configuration and was most economical with respect to time required to reach a rotational solution. The analytical method required the least number of judgmental decisions and was the most objective. The graphical method was the most laborious but had a slight advantage with regard to the number of near-zero loadings in the rotational solution.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 1958, pp. 211 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © 1958 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Carroll, J. B. An analytical solution for approximating simple structure in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1953, 18, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fruchter, B. Orthogonal and oblique solutions to a battery of aptitude, achievement, and background variables. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1952, 12, 20–38.10.1177/001316445201200102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fruchter, B. Introduction to factor analysis, New York: Van Nostrand, 1954.Google Scholar
Harris, C. W. Direct rotation to primary structure. J. educ. Psychol., 1948, 39, 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. W. Projections of three types of factor patterns. J. exp. Educ., 1949, 17, 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. W. and Knoell, D. M. The oblique solution in factor analysis. J. educ. Psychol., 1948, 39, 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhaus, J. O. and Wrigley, C. The quartimax method: an analytical approach to orthogonal simple structure. Brit. J. statist. Psychol., 1954, 7, 81–91.10.1111/j.2044-8317.1954.tb00147.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, D. R. An analytical method for rotation to orthogonal simple structures. Educational Testing Service Research Bulletin, 53-10, August 1953.10.1002/j.2333-8504.1953.tb00890.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. An analytical method for simple structure. Psychometrika, 1954, 19, 173–182.10.1007/BF02289182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, W. S. A simple graphical method for orthogonal rotation of axes. Psychometrika, 1946, 11, 51–55.10.1007/BF02288899CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed