Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T09:41:18.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparison of Generalized and Modified Sample Biserial Correlation Estimators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Edward J. Bedrick
Edward J. Bedrick*
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Edward J. Bedrick, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a recent paper, Bedrick derived the asymptotic distribution of Lord's modified sample biserial correlation estimator and studied its efficiency for bivariate normal populations. We present a more detailed examination of the properties of Lord's estimator and several competitors, including Brogden's estimator. We show that Lord's estimator is more efficient for three nonnormal distributions than a generalization of Pearson's sample biserial estimator. In addition, Lord's estimator is reasonably efficient relative to the maximum likelihood estimator for these distributions. These conclusions are consistent with Bedrick's results for the bivariate normal distribution. We also study the small sample bias and variance of Lord's estimator, and the coverage properties of several confidence interval estimates.

Keywords

asymptotic efficiencybiserial correlationconfidence intervalmixed continuous and discrete data

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , June 1992, pp. 183 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The author would like to thank the referees for several suggestions that improved the paper.

References

Bedrick, E. J. (1990). On the large sample distributions of modified sample biserial correlation coefficients. Psychometrika, 55, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brogden, H. E. (1949). A new coefficient: Application to biserial correlation and to estimation of selective efficiency. Psychometrika, 14, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S. (1970). Distributions in statistics: Continuous multivariate distributions, New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Kraemer, H. C. (1981). Modified biserial correlation coefficients. Psychometrika, 46, 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. (1963). Biserial estimates of correlation. Psychometrika, 28, 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. G. Jr. (1974). The jackknife: A review. Biometrika, 61, 1–16.Google Scholar
Maronna, R. A. (1976). Robust M-estimators of multivariate location and scatter. Annals of Statistics, 4, 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, K. (1909). On a new method of determining the correlation between a measured character A and a character B. Biometrika, 7, 96–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R. (1973). Linear statistical inference and its applications 2nd ed.,, New York: John Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W., Cochran, W. G. (1978). Statistical methods (6th ed.),, Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Soper, H. E. (1913). On the probable error for the biserial expression for the correlation coefficient. Biometrika, 10, 384–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, R. F. (1955). The theory of correlation between two continuous variables when one is dichotomized. Biometrika, 42, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar