Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T22:33:12.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computer Models of Cognitive Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Bert F. Green Jr.
Bert F. Green Jr.*
Affiliation:
Lincoln Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Twenty-five years ago, when the Psychometric Society was formed, the new developments that were then shaping the course of psychometric research were subjective scaling and factor analysis. Today, a development that seems destined to influence psychometric research in the next twenty-five years is the simulation of cognitive processes on high-speed digital computers. So far, of course, there has been more talk about the potential utility of computers in psychology than there has been accomplishment; nevertheless, what achievements have been made seem to me to imply a bright future.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , March 1961 , pp. 85 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © 1961 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Operated with support from the United States Army, Navy, and Air Force.

References

Boring, E. G. Mind and machinism. Amer. J. Psychol., 1946, 59, 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, W. Recognition of sloppy hand-printed characters. Proc. Western Joint Computer Conf., 1960, 17, 133–143.Google Scholar
Forgie, J. W. and Forgie, C. D. Results obtained from a vowel recognition computer program. J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 1959, 31, 1480–1489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedberg, R. M. A learning machine, Part 1. IBM J. Res. and Devel., 1958, 2, 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelernter, H., Hansen, J. R., and Loveland, D. W. Empirical explorations of the geometry theorem machine. Proc. Western Joint Computer Conf., 1960, 17, 143–150.Google Scholar
McCulloch, W. S. and Pitts, W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophys., 1943, 5, 115–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., and Pribram, K. H. Plans and the structure of behavior, New York: Holt, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., and Simon, H. A. Elements of a theory of human problem solving. Psychol. Rev., 1958, 65, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashevsky, N. Mathematical biophysics, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, F. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol. Rev., 1958, 65, 386–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed