Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-g96k6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T23:44:25.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consistent Estimation in the Rasch Model based on Nonparametric Margins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Dean Follmann
Dean Follmann*
Affiliation:
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Biostatistics Research Branch
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Dean Foltmann, NHLBI, Rm 2All, 7550 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda MD 20892.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Consider the class of two parameter marginal logistic (Rasch) models, for a test of m True-False items, where the latent ability is assumed to be bounded. Using results of Karlin and Studen, we show that this class of nonparametric marginal logistic (NML) models is equivalent to the class of marginal logistic models where the latent ability assumes at most (m + 2)/2 values. This equivalence has two implications. First, estimation for the NML model is accomplished by estimating the parameters of a discrete marginal logistic model. Second, consistency for the maximum likelihood estimates of the NML model can be shown (when m is odd) using the results of Kiefer and Wolfowitz. An example is presented which demonstrates the estimation strategy and contrasts the NML model with a normal marginal logistic model.

Keywords

nonparametricEM algorithmconsistencyidentifiabilitymarginal logistic modellatent abilityitem analysisRasch model

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , December 1988 , pp. 553 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This research was supported by NIMH traning grant, 2 T32 MH 15758-06 and by ONR contract N00014-84-K-0588. The author would like to thank Diane Lambert, John Rolph, and Stephen Fienberg for their assistance. Also, the comments of the referees helped to substantially improve the final version of this paper.

References

Andersen, E. B. (1973). Conditional inference for multiple-choice questionnaires. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 26, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, E. B. (1980). Comparing latent distributions. Psychometrika, 45, 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, E. B. (1980). Discrete statistical models with social science applications, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Andersen, E. B., & Madsen, M. (1977). Estimating the parameters of the latent population distribution. Psychometrika, 42, 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, A. (1958). On the estimation of mental ability (series Report No. 15). Randolph Air Force Base, USAF School of Aviation Medicine.Google Scholar
Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cressie, N., & Holland, P. W. (1983). Characterizing the manifest probabilities of latent trait models. Psychometrika, 48, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Leeuw, J., & Verhelst, N. (1986). Maximum likelihood estimation in generalized Rasch models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation with incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, O. D. (1984). Rasch Measurement: Further Examples and Discussion. In Turner, C. F. & Martin, E. (Eds.), Surveying subjective phenomena (vol. 2), New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Fienberg, S. E. (1986). The Rasch model. In Katz, S. & Johnson, N. L. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical science (vol. 7), New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Fienberg, S. E., & Meyer, M. M. (1983). Loglinear models and categorical data analysis with psychometric and econometric applications. Journal of Econometrics, 22, 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follmann, D. A. (1985). Nonparametric mixtures of logistic regression models, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J., & Singer, B. (1984). A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica, 52, 271–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, P. W. (1981). When are item response models consistent with observed data?. Psychometrika, 46, 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlin, S., & Studden, W. J. (1966). Tchebycheff systems: With applications in analysis and statistics, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kiefer, J., & Wolfowitz, J. (1956). Consistency of the maximum likelihood estimator in the presence of infinitely many incidental parameters. The Annals of Statistics, 27, 805–811.Google Scholar
Mislevy, R. J. (1984). Estimating latent distributions. Psychometrika, 49, 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests, Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut.Google Scholar
Redner, R. A., & Walker, H. F. (1984). Mixture Densities, Maximum Likelihood and the EM Algorithm. SIAM Review, 26(2), 195–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanathanan, L., & Blumenthal, S. (1978). The Logistic model and estimation of latent structure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 794–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simar, L. (1976). Maximum likelihood estimation of a compound Poisson process. The Annals of Statistics, 4, 1200–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouffer, S. A., & Toby, J. (1951). Role conflict and personality. American Journal of Sociology, 56, 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teicher, H. (1963). Identifiability of finite mixtures. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34, 1265–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thissen, D. (1982). Marginal maximum likelihood for the one parameter logistic model. Psychometrika, 47, 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjur, T. (1982). A connection between Rasch's item analysis model and a multiplicative Poisson model. Scandanavian Journal of Statistics, 9, 23–30.Google Scholar
Wu, C. F. Jeff (1983). On the convergence properties of the EM algorithm. The Annals of Statistics, 11, 95–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar