Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T07:22:56.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Group Heterogeneity on Item Parameters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Harold Gulliksen
Harold Gulliksen*
Affiliation:
Educational Testing Service
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most indexes of item validity and difficulty vary systematically with changes in the mean and variance of the group. Formulas are presented showing how certain item parameters will vary with these alterations in group mean and variance. Item parameters are also suggested which should remain invariant under such changes. These parameters are developed under two different assumptions: first, the assumption that the total distribution of the item ability variable is normal, and, second, that the distribution of the item ability variable for each array of the explicit selection variable is normal.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 1951, pp. 285 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © 1951 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

The writer wishes to acknowledge helpful discussions of this paper with Paul Horst and Herbert S. Sichel who have worked on various aspects of the problem of invariant item parameters.

References

Aitken, A. C. Note on selection from a multivariate normal population. Proc. Edinb. math. Soc., 1934, 4, 106–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Cyri. Statistical problems in the evaluation of Army tests. Psychometrika, 1944, 9, 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillman, Leonar. Goode, Harry H. An estimate of the correlation coefficient of a bivariate normal population when X is truncated and Y is dichotomized. Har. educ. Rev., 1946, 16, 52–55.Google Scholar
Kelley, T. L. Statistical Methods, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1923.Google Scholar
Pearson, Kar. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. XI. On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organs. Phil. Trans., 1903, 200-A, 1–66.Google Scholar
Sichel, H. S. First peace-time validation of army selection tests with a discussion of some statistical problems encountered in this project. Bulletin of the National Institute for Personnel Research of the South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, 1950, 2, 4–35.Google Scholar
Thorndike, R. L. Personnel selection: test and measurement techniques, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1949.Google Scholar