Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T09:55:58.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A General Least Squares Solution for Successive Intervals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Gertrude W. Diederich,
Samuel J. Messick and
Ledyard R Tucker
Gertrude W. Diederich
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Samuel J. Messick
Affiliation:
Princeton University and Educational Testing Service
Ledyard R Tucker
Affiliation:
Princeton University and Educational Testing Service
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A general least squares solution for successive intervals is presented, along with iterative procedures for obtaining stimulus scale values, discriminal dispersions, and category boundaries. Because provisions for weighting were incorporated into the derivation, the solution may be applied without loss of rigor to the typical experimental matrix of incomplete data, i.e., to a data matrix with missing entries, as well as to the rarely occurring matrix of complete data. The use of weights also permits adjustments for variations in the reliability of estimates obtained from the data. The computational steps involved in the solution are enumerated, the amount of labor required comparing favorably with other procedures. A quick, yet accurate, graphical approximation suggested by the least squares derivation is also described.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 1957, pp. 159 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © 1957 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This research was jointly supported in part by Princeton University, the Office of Naval Research under contract N6onr-270-20, and the National Science Foundation under grant NSF G-642, and in part by Educational Testing Service.

References

Attneave, F. A method of graded dichotomies for the scaling of judgments. Psychol. Rev., 1949, 56, 334–340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, Ruth Points of neutrality in social attitudes of delinquents and non-delinquents. Psychometrika, 1940, 5, 35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. L. The scaling of stimuli by the method of successive intervals. J. appl. Psychol., 1952, 36, 118–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D. J. Probit analysis, New York: Cambridge Univer. Press, 1952Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. Theory of statistical estimation. Proc. Cam. Phil. Soc., 1925, 22, 700–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, W. R. and Hake, H. W. The amount of information in absolute judgments. Psychol. Rev., 1951, 58, 446–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, B. F. Attitude measurement. In Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1954Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. Psychometric methods, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1936Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. The computation of psychological values from judgments in absolute categories. J. exp. Psychol., 1938, 22, 32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliksen, H. A least squares solution for successive intervals assuming unequal standard deviations. Psychometrika, 1954, 19, 117–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M. G. The advanced theory of statistics. II, London: Griffin, 1948Google Scholar
Messick, S., Tucker, L., and Garrison, H. A punched card procedure for the method of successive intervals. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, Research Bulletin 55-25.Google Scholar
Mosier, C. I. A modification of the method of successive intervals. Psychometrika, 1940, 5, 101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimoldi, H. J. A. and Hormaeche, Marceva. The law of comparative judgment in the successive intervals and graphic rating scale methods. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, Research Bulletin 54-5.Google Scholar
Saffir, M. A comparative study of scales constructed by three psychophysical methods. Psychometrika, 1937, 2, 179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. A method of scaling psychological and educational tests. J. educ. Psychol., 1925, 16, 433–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol. Rev., 1927, 34, 424–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. The unit of measurement in educational scales. J. educ. Psychol., 1927, 18, 505–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. and Chave, E. J. The measurement of attitude, Chicago: Univer. Chicago Press, 1929Google Scholar
Torgerson, W. S. A law of categorical judgment. In Clark, L. S. (Eds.), Consumer behavior, New York: New York Univer. Press, 1954Google Scholar
Torgerson, W. S. Theory and method of scaling. Social Science Research Council (to be published).Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. A level of proficiency scale for a unidimensional skill. Amer. Psychologist, 1952, 7, 408–408. (Abstract)Google Scholar