No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Identification of a Semiparametric Item Response Model
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2025
Abstract
We consider the identification of a semiparametric multidimensional fixed effects item response model. Item response models are typically estimated under parametric assumptions about the shape of the item characteristic curves (ICCs), and existing results suggest difficulties in recovering the distribution of individual characteristics under nonparametric assumptions. We show that if the shape of the ICCs are unrestricted, but the shape is common across individuals and items, the individual characteristics are identified. If the shape of the ICCs are allowed to differ over items, the individual characteristics are identified in the multidimensional linear compensatory case but only identified up to a monotonic transformation in the unidimensional case. Our results suggest the development of two new semiparametric estimators for the item response model.
Information
- Type
- Original Paper
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2012 The Psychometric Society
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s11336-012-9253-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In Lord, F.M., Novick, M.R. Statistical theories of mental test scores, Reading: Addison-Wesley 392479Google Scholar
Bock, R.D., Aitken, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: An application of the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 6, 443–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, R.D., Lieberman, M. (1970). Fitting a response curve model for dichotomously scored items. Psychometrika, 35, 179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, J.A. (1997). Joint consistency of nonparametric item characteristic curve and ability estimation. Psychometrika, 62, 7–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, J.A. (2001). Asymptotic identifiability of nonparametric item response models. Psychometrika, 66, 531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. (1981). The incidental parameters problem and the problem of initial conditions in estimating a discrete time-discrete data stochastic process and some Monte Carlo evidence. In Manski, C., McFadden, D. Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications, Cambridge: MIT Press 179195Google Scholar
Kiefer, J., Wolfowitz, J. (1956). Consistency of the maximum likelihood estimator in the presence of infinitely many incidental parameters. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27, 887–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F.M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Peress, M., Spirling, A. (2010). Scaling the critics: Uncovering the latent dimensions of movie criticism. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105, 71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, K.T. (2000). Non-parametric unfolding of binary choice data. Political Analysis, 8, 211–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H. (1991). Patterns of congressional voting. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 228–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, K.T., Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A political economic history of roll call voting, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J.O. (1991). Kernel smoothing approaches to nonparametric item characteristic curve estimation. Psychometrika, 56, 611–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J.O., Abrahamowicz, M. (1989). Binomial regression with monotone splines: A psychometric application. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 906–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sijtsma, K. (1998). Methodology review: Nonparametric IRT approaches to the analysis of dichotomous item scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 52, 79–97Google Scholar
Peress supplementary material
Peress supplementary material
File
235.4 KB
- 6
- Cited by