Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T12:58:39.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Latent Structure for the Simplex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

W. A. Gibson
W. A. Gibson*
Affiliation:
Queens College of the City University of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A perfect Guttman scale generates a perfect Guttman simplex. This is capitalized on to get a transformation useful in a kind of non-linear factor analysis applicable to empirical correlations resembling but not necessarily conforming to a perfect simplex.

A Gramian factorization—square, symmetric, possibly of low rank but with no negative characteristic roots—of empirical correlations is transformed into latent information about nonlinear regressions of tests on a single underlying dimension. Class intervals on that continuum are defined in terms of their standard score profiles on the tests. Each class interval exhibits “local independence,” so that individual members may vary but may not covary in their profiles.

The method is flexible as to choice of diagonals, fitted rank, and exact shape of resulting non-linear regressions, so long as those regressions are essentially monotonic and have a proper progression of curvatures. Construction of the needed transformation for data of any size is outlined, and the problem of metric for the latent continuum is given several solutions.

An empirical example is provided with full and low rank solutions involving different diagonal choices.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 1967 , pp. 35 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © 1967 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This research was conducted under Grant Nonr(G)-00033-63 of the Office of Naval Research. Reproduction of this paper, in whole or in part, is permitted for any purpose of the United States government.

References

Brigham, C. C. A study of error, New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1932.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. The effect of difficulty and chance success on correlations between items or between tests. Psychometrika, 1945, 10, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuBois, P. H. An analysis of Guttman's simplex. Psychometrika, 1960, 25, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, G. A. The factorial interpretation of test difficulty. Psychometrika, 1941, 6, 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, J. C. Factor analysis in the study of personality, Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Gibson, W. A. Factoring the circumplex. Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, W. A. Gramian factoring. (Unpublished manuscript.).Google Scholar
Gibson, W. A. The most isomorphic factorization. Paper presented at the fourth annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Bryn Mawr College, August, 1963.Google Scholar
Gibson, W. A. Nonlinear factors in two dimensions. Psychometrika, 1960, 25, 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, W. A. The practical rank of an empirical simplex. Symposium on research and teaching methods in multivariate experimental design. Washington: Office of Naval Research p. 13. (Abstract), 1962.Google Scholar
Gibson, W. A. Properties and applications of Gramian factoring. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Gibson, W. A. Symmetric factoring. Amer. Psychol., 1958, 13, 375–375. (Abstract).Google Scholar
Gibson, W. A. On the symmetric treatment of an asymmetric approach to factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1963, 28, 423–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, W. A. Three multivariate models: factor analysis, latent structure analysis, and latent profile analysis. Psychometrika, 1959, 24, 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. The difficulty of a test and its factor composition. Psychometrika, 1941, 6, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. Human abilities. Psychol. Rev., 1940, 47, 367–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. The basis for scalogram analysis. In Stouffer, S. A. et al. (Eds.), Mearsurement and prediction. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950, 60–90.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. Empirical verification of the radex structure of mental abilities and personality traits. Educ. Psychol. Measmt., 1957, 17, 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. A generalized simplex for factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1955, 20, 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. A new approach to factor analysis: the radex. In Lazarsfeld, P. F. (Eds.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1954, 258–348.Google Scholar
Hertzman, M. The effects of the relative difficulty of mental tests on patterns of mental organization. Arch. Psychol., No. 197, 1936.Google Scholar
Humphreys, L. G. Investigations of the simplex. Psychometrika, 1960, 25, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. B. Simplex theory, Pensacola: U. S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine, 1959.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. F. Scaling a simplex. Psychometrika, 1962, 27, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. Latent structure analysis. In Koch, S. (Eds.), Psychology: a study of a science, Vol. 3. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959, 476–543.Google Scholar
Peatman, J. G. Descriptive and sampling statistics, New York: Harper, 1947.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. A method of scaling psychological and educational tests. J. Educ. Psych., 1925, 16, 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Multiple-factor analysis, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.Google Scholar
Wherry, R. J. and Gaylord, R. H. Factor pattern of test items and tests as a function of the correlation coefficient: content, difficulty, and constant error factors. Psychometrika, 1944, 9, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodrow, H. The effect of practice on test intercorrelations. J. Educ. Psych., 1938, 29, 561–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar