Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T10:26:26.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Least Squares Solution for Successive Intervals Assuming Unequal Standard Deviations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Harold Gulliksen
Harold Gulliksen*
Affiliation:
Princeton University and Educational Testing Service
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A least squares solution has been presented for the Law of Categorical Judgment and the Method of Successive Intervals, which is formally equivalent to Horst's solution for the matrix of incomplete data. A simplified approximation which is recommended for use with any matrix of complete data is also given. A procedure, analogous to that originally devised by Thurstone and presented by Saffir, is outlined for the typical experimental matrix of incomplete data. It is essentially a “point and slope” method of fitting a straight line which comes rather directly from the least squares solution.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 1954, pp. 117 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © 1954 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This study was supported in part by Office of Naval Research Contract N6onr 270-20 with Princeton University.

†

The author wishes to acknowledge helpful suggestions and comments received in discussions of this problem with Max Woodbury, Frederic Lord, Frederick Mosteller, Warren Torgerson, Robert Abelson, and Bert F. Green, Jr. Thanks are due to Mrs. Gertrude Diederich and Irving Abrams for work on the computing necessary for the illustrative applications.

References

Attneave, F.. A method of graded dichotomies for the scaling of judgments. Psychol. Rev., 1949, 56, 334–340CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanagan, J. C.. A bulletin reporting the basic principles and procedures used in the development of their system of scaled scores, New York: Cooperative Test Service, American Council on Education, 1939Google Scholar
Gulliksen, H.. Paired comparisons and the logic of measurement. Psychol. Rev., 1946, 53, 199–213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horst, P. The prediction of personal adjustment. Social Science Research Council Bulletin 48, 1941.Google Scholar
Mosteller, F.. Remarks on the method of paired comparisons. I. The least squares solution assuming equal standard deviations and equal correlations. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosteller, F.. Remarks on the method of paired comparisons. III. A test of significance for paired comparisons when equal standard deviations and equal intercorrelations are assumed. Psychometrika, 1951, 16, 207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffir, M. A.. A comparative study of scales constructed by three psychophysical methods. Psychometrika, 1937, 2, 179–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, W.. The inverted factor technique. Brit. J. Psychol., 1936, 26, 344–361Google Scholar
Stephenson, W.. Methodological consideration of Jung's typology. J. Mental Sci., 1939, 85, 185–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S.. On the problem of scales for the measurement of psychological magnitudes. J. of Unif. Sci., 1939, 9, 94–99Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S., Volkmann, J.. The relation of pitch to frequency: a revised scale. Amer. J. Psychol., 1940, 53, 329–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L.. A method of scaling psychological and educational tests. J. Educ. Psychol., 1925, 16, 433–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L.. Psychophysical analysis. Amer. J. Psychol., 1927, 38, 368–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L.. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol. Rev., 1927, 34, 273–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thursone, L. L.. Three psychophysical laws. Psychol. Rev., 1927, 34, 424–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L.. Equally often noticed differences. J. Educ. Psychol., 1927, 18, 289–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L. L.. The unit of measurement in educational scales. J. Educ. Psychol., 1927, 18, 505–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgerson, W. S. A theoretical and empirical investigation of multidimensional scaling. Research Bulletin (RB-51-14), Educational Testing Service. Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, 1951. (Also Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 401–419.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkmann, J.. The method of single stimuli. Amer. J. Psychol., 1932, 44, 808–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wever, E. G., Zener, K. E.. The method of absolute judgment in psychophysics. Psychol. Rev., 1928, 35, 466–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar