Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T22:28:44.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maximum Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Semiparametric Item Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

J. O. Ramsay  and
S. Winsberg
J. O. Ramsay*
Affiliation:
McGill University
S. Winsberg
Affiliation:
IRCAM
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to J. O. Ramsay, Department of Psychology, 1205 Dr. Penfield Ave., Montreal, Quebec, CANADA H3A 1B1.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The item characteristic curve (ICC), defining the relation between ability and the probability of choosing a particular option for a test item, can be estimated by using polynomial regression splines. These provide a more flexible family of functions than is given by the three-parameter logistic family. The estimation of spline ICCs is described by maximizing the marginal likelihood formed by integrating ability over a beta prior distribution. Some simulation results compare this approach with the joint estimation of ability and item parameters.

Keywords

I-splinesmonotone splinesregression splinesbeta Gaussian quadrature

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 365 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The research reported in this paper was supported by Grants APA320 and A4035 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. It was also supported by Contract No. F41689-82-C-10020 from the Air Force Human Resources Laboratory to Educational Testing Service. The author wishes to thank M. Abrahamowicz for his assistance and R. Darrell Bock for providing the parameters for the items used in the simulations.

References

Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I. A. (1964). Handbook of mathematical functions, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Andersen, E. (1973). Conditional inference and multiple choice questionnaires. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 26, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. C. (1979). A family of switching algorithms for the computer generation of beta random variates. Biometrika, 66, 141–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, R. D., Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, R. D., Lieberman, M. (1970). Fitting a response model for n dichotomously scored items. Psychometrika, 35, 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brieman, L., Friedman, J. H. (1985). Estimating optimal transformations for multiple regression and correlation (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80, 580–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Leeuw, J. (1988). Multivariate analysis with linearizable regressions. Psychometrika, 53, 437–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., Williams, B., McLaughlin, M. E., Candell, G. L. (1989). Modeling incorrect responses to multiple-choice items with multilinear formula score theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golub, G. H., Welsch, J. H. (1969). Calculation of Gauss quadrature rules. Mathematics of Computation, 23, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, M. V. (1984). An introduction to multilinear formula score theory, Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Department of Educational Psychology, Model-Based Measurement Laboratory.Google Scholar
Levine, M. V. (1985). The trait in latent trait theory. In Weiss, D. J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1982 item response theory/ computerized adaptive testing conference (pp. 41–65). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Computerized Adaptive Testing Laboratory.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. (1986). Test theory and Psychometrika: The past twenty-five years. Psychometrika, 51, 11–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mislevy, R. J., Bock, R. D. (1982). BILOG: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models [Computer Program], Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. (1986). Numerical recipes: The art of scientific computing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsay, J. O. (1988). Monotone regression splines in action (with discussion). Statistical Science, 3, 425–461.Google Scholar
Ramsay, J. O. (1989). A comparison of three simple test theory models. Psychometrika, 54, 487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. O., Abrahjamowicz, M. (1989). Binomial regression with monotone splines: A psychometric application. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 906–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests, Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut.Google Scholar
Samejima, F. (1977). A method of estimating item characteristic functions using the maximum likelihood estimate of ability. Psychometrika, 42, 161–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F. (1979). A new family of models for the multiple choice item, Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F. (1984). Plausibility functions of Iowa Vocabulary Test items estimated by the simple sum procedure of the conditional P.D.F. approach, Knoxville: University of Tennessee, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
Stoer, J., Bulirsch, R. (1980). Introduction to numerical analysis, New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibshirani, R. J. (1988). Estimating transformations for regression via additivity and variance stabilization. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 394–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsberg, S., Ramsay, J. O. (1980). Monotonic transformations to addivity using splines. Biometrika, 67, 669–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsberg, S., Ramsay, J. O. (1983). Monotonic spline transformations for dimension reduction. Psychometrika, 48, 403–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsberg, S., Thissen, D., Wainer, H. (1984). Fitting item characteristic curves with spline functions, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.CrossRefGoogle Scholar