Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T08:50:11.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Mixture Model for Distributions of Correlation Coefficients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Hoben Thomas
Hoben Thomas*
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Hoben Thomas, The Pennsylvania State University, 513 Moore Building, University Park, PA 16802.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An old problem in personnel psychology is to characterize distributions of test validity correlation coefficients. The proposed model views histograms of correlation coefficients as observations from a mixture distribution which, for a fixed sample size n, is a conditional mixture distribution h(r|n) = Σjλjh(r; ρj, n), where R is the correlation coefficient, ρj are population correlation coefficients and λj are the mixing weights. The associated marginal distribution of R is regarded as the parent distribution underlying histograms of empirical correlation coefficients. Maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters ρj and λj can be obtained with an EM algorithm solution and tests for the number of components t are achieved after the (one-component) density of R is replaced with a tractable modeling density h(r; ρj, n). Two illustrative examples are provided.

Keywords

validity generalizationfinite mixturescorrelation coefficientsmixture decompositionEM algorithm

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , September 1989, pp. 523 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aitkin, M., & Wilson, G. T. (1980). Mixture models, outliers, and the EM algorithm. Technometrics, 22, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babu, G. J., & Singh, K. (1983). Inference on means using the bootstrap. The Annals of Statistics, 11, 999–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, M. J. (1984). Validity generalization: A review and critique of the correlational model. Personnel Psychology, 37, 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramér, H. (1946). Mathematical methods of statistics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
David, F. N. (1938). Tables of the ordinates and probability integral of the distribution of the correlation coefficient in small samples, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1986). Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statistical Science, 1, 54–77.Google Scholar
Ghiselli, E. E. (1966). The validity of occupational aptitude tests, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental tests, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Patel, J. K., & Read, C. B. (1982). Handbook of the normal distribution, New York: Marcel Dekker.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakamoto, Y., Ishiguor, M., & Kitagawa, G. (1986). Akaike information criterion statistics, Boston: Reidel.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 529–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1978). Moderator research and the law of small numbers. Personnel Psychology, 31, 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, S. (1938). The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 9, 60–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar