Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T20:34:46.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Model for the Analysis of Multiple Strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

N. John Castellan Jr.
N. John Castellan Jr.*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In many decision problems the decision-maker must ask a series of questions or select cues relevant to but prior to the decision. There are many strategies which would prescribe an order for asking such questions or selecting such cues. It is the purpose of the paper to describe a manner in which the strategy or strategies of the decision-maker can be analyzed. From this model can be derived limits corresponding to the possible use of a particular strategy, and the effective or observed use of the strategy or strategies by the decision-maker.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , December 1966, pp. 475 - 490
Copyright
Copyright © 1966 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Preparation of this paper was supported in part by Fellowship 1-F1-MH-24, 324-01, from the National Institute of Mental Health. This paper comprises Publication Number 63 of the Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado. The author would like to thank K. R. Hammond and D. W. Stilson for many helpful comments and suggestions.

References

Bradley, R. A. and Terry, M. E. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 1952, 39, 324–345.Google Scholar
Cooper, B. E. The effect of ties on the moments of rank criteria. Biometrika, 1957, 44, 526–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, F. N. and Barton, D. E. Combinatorial chance, New York: Hafner, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haden, H. G. A note on the distribution of the different orderings ofn objects. Proc. camb. phil. Soc., 1947, 43, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, K. R. and Castellan, N. J. Jr. Analyzing information-seeking strategies. Report No. 59, Behavior Research Laboratory, Inst. Behav. Sci., Univ. Colorado, 1965.Google Scholar
Hammond, K. R., Kelly, K., Castellan, N. J., Schneider, R., and Vancini, M. Clinical inference in nursing: V. The use of information-seeking strategies by nurses. Journal of Nursing Research, 1966, 15, 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemeny, J. G. and Snell, J. L. Mathematical models and the social sciences, Boston: Ginn, 1962.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G. Rank correlation methods (2nd ed.), London: C. Griffin, 1955.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. Individual choice behavior, New York: Wiley, 1959.Google Scholar
Mallows, C. L. Non-null ranking models. Biometrika, 1957, 44, 114–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, P. A. P. Partial and multiple rank correlation. Biometrika, 1951, 37, 26–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar