Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T10:20:01.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monotone Spline Transformations for Dimension Reduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

S. Winsberg  and
J. O. Ramsay
S. Winsberg
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
J. O. Ramsay*
Affiliation:
McGill University
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to J. O. Ramsay, Department of Psychology, 1205 Dr. Penfield Ave., Montréal, Québec, Canada H3A 1B1.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Consider a set of data consisting of measurements of n objects with respect to p variables displayed in an n × p matrix. A monotone transformation of the values in each column, represented as a linear combination of integrated basis splines, is assumed determined by a linear combination of a new set of values characterizing each row object. Two different models are used: one, an Eckart-Young decomposition model, and the other, a multivariate normal model. Examples for artificial and real data are presented. The results indicate that both methods are helpful in choosing dimensionality and that the Eckart-Young model is also helpful in displaying the relationships among the objects and the variables. Also, results suggest that the resulting transformations are themselves illuminating.

Keywords

I-splinesEckart-Young decompositiontransformation to normalitymultivariate normalcovariance structuremaximum likelihood estimation

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , December 1983 , pp. 575 - 595
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This investigation was supported in part by research grants A4035 and APA0320 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to the first and second authors, respectively. We wish to thank the referees for their helpful comments.

References

Andrews, D. F., Gnanadesikan, R. & Warner, J. L. Transformations of multivariate data. Biometrika, 1971, 27, 825–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, G. E. P. & Cox, D. R. Analysis of transformations (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 1964, 26, 211–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, H. B. & Schoenberg, I. J. On spline distribution functions and their limits: the Pólya distribution functions. Abstract 380t. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 1947, 53, 1114–1114.Google Scholar
Curry, H. B. & Schoenberg, I. J. On Pólya frequency functions. IV: The fundamental spline functions and their limits. Journal d'Analyse Mathématique, 1966, 17, 71–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Boor, C. A Practical Guide to Splines, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckart, C. & Young, G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, 1936, 1, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifi, A. Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis, Leiden: Department of Datatheorie, 1981.Google Scholar
Harman, H. H. Modern Factor Analysis revised edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. & Shepard, R. N. A nonmetric variety of linear factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1974, 38, 123–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. O. Monotonic weighted power transformations to additivity. Psychometrika, 1977, 42, 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. O. Maximum likelihood estimation in multidimensional scaling. Psychometrika, 1977, 42, 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. O. Some statistical approaches to multidimensional scaling data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 1982, 145, 285–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Rijckevorsel, J. Canonical analysis with B-splines, in Caussinus, H., Ettinger, P., & Tomassone, R. (Eds.), COMPST AT 1982, Part I, Wien, Physica Verlag, 1982.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc.. SAS User's Guide: Statistics 1982 Edition, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1982.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. Multiple Factor Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago, 1947.Google Scholar
Winsberg, S. & Ramsay, J. O. Monotonic transformations to additivity using splines. Biometrika, 1980, 67, 669–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsberg, S. & Ramsay, J. O. Analysis of pairwise preferences data using integrated B-splines. Psychometrika, 1981, 46, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, F. W., Takane, Y. & de Leeuw, J. The principal components of mixed measurement level multivariate data: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features. Psychometrika, 1978, 43, 279–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar