Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T23:41:39.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Component Analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

William Meredith  and
Roger E. Millsap
William Meredith*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Roger E. Millsap
Affiliation:
Baruch College, City University of New York
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to William Meredith, Department of Psychology, Tolman Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Principal components analysis can be redefined in terms of the regression of observed variables upon component variables. Two criteria for the adequacy of a component representation in this context are developed and are shown to lead to different component solutions. Both criteria are generalized to allow weighting, the choice of weights determining the scale invariance properties of the resulting solution. A theorem is presented giving necessary and sufficient conditions for equivalent component solutions under different choices of weighting. Applications of the theorem are discussed that involve the components analysis of linearly derived variables and of external variables.

Keywords

Principal componentslinear regressionscale invarianceimage analysis

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , December 1985 , pp. 495 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Preparation of this article was supported in part by National Institute of Aging Grant NIA-AG03164-03 to William Meredith.

References

Aitken, A. C. (1934). On least squares and the linear combination of observations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 55, 42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. W. (1958). An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bellman, R. (1960). Introduction to matrix analysis, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Brillinger, D. R. (1975). Time series: Data analysis and theory, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Comrey, A. L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cramèr, H. (1945). Mathematical methods of statistics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Darroch, J. N. (1965). An optimal property of principal components. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 36, 1579–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, A. P. (1969). Elements of continuous multivariate analysis, Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Eckart, C., Young, G. (1936). The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, 1, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, J. D. (1974). A general model for multivariate analysis, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Gorsuch, R. L. (1974). Factor analysis, Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
Graybill, F. A. (1969). An introduction to matrices with applications in statistics, Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Green, B. F. (1950). A note on the calculation of weights for maximum battery reliability. Psychometrika, 15, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, L. (1941). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 6, 153–160.Google Scholar
Guttman, L. (1953). Image theory for the structure of quantitative variates. Psychometrika, 18, 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, H. H. (1967). Modern factor analysis 2nd ed.,, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harris, C. W. (1962). Some Rao-Guttman relationships. Psychometrika, 27, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. W., Kaiser, H. F. (1964). Oblique factor analytic solutions by orthogonal transformations. Psychometrika, 29, 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horst, P. (1963). Matrix algebra for social scientists, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Horst, P. (1965). Factor analysis of data matrices, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Horst, P. (1969). Generalized factor analysis, Part I (Office of Naval Research, Contract Nonr-477(33)), Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G. (1963). Statistical estimation in factor analysis, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. F. (1963). Image analysis. In Harris, C. W. (Eds.), Problems in measuring change (pp. 156–166). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M. G. (1957). A course in multivariate analysis, London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G., Stuart, A. (1968). The advanced theory of statistics (Vol. 3 2nd ed.,, London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Kramer, H. P., Mathews, M. V. (1956). A linear coding for transmitting a set of correlated signals. IRE Transactions in Information Theory, IT-2, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M. (1958). Some relations between Guttman's principal components of scale analysis and other psychometric theory. Psychometrika, 23, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores, Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
McKeon, J. J. (1964). Canonical analysis: Some relations between canonical correlation, factor analysis, discriminant function analysis and scaling theory [Monograph]. Psychometrika, (No. 13).Google Scholar
Meredith, W. (1964). Canonical correlations with fallible data. Psychometrika, 29, 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, W. (1965). Some results based on a general stochastic model for mental tests. Psychometrika, 30, 419–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, D. F. (1976). Multivariate statistical methods 2nd ed.,, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mulaik, S. A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Overall, J. E., Klett, J. C. (1972). Applied multivariate analysis, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1901). On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine, 50, 157–175.Google Scholar
Peel, E. A. (1947). A short method for calculating maximum battery reliability. Nature, 159, 816–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R. (1965). Linear statistical inference, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schönemann, P. H., Steiger, J. H. (1976). Regression component analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 29, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatsuoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis: Techniques for educational and psychological research, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Thomson, G. H. (1951). The factorial analysis of human ability 5th ed.,, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Timm, N. H. (1975). Multivariate analysis with applications in education and psychology, Monterey: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
Wilks, S. S. (1962). Mathematical statistics 2nd ed.,, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar