Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T05:41:00.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Linear Combinations of Binary Item Scores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

T. Krishnan
T. Krishnan*
Affiliation:
Indian Statistical InstituteThe University of Western Australia
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A method is given for finding a linear combination of binary item scores that minimizes the expected frequency of misclassification, in discriminating between two groups. The item scores are not assumed to be stochastically independent. The method uses the theory of threshold functions, developed by electrical engineers. Since psychometricians may not be familiar with this theory an elementary introduction to the required material is also given.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , September 1973, pp. 291 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, T. W. and Bahadur, R. R. Classification into two multivariate normal distributions with different covariance matrices. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1962, 33, 420–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahadur, R. R. A representation of the joint distribution of responses to n dichotomous items. In Solomon, H. (Eds.), Studies in item analysis and prediction. Calif.: Stanford University Press. 1961, 158–168Google Scholar
Bahadur, R. R. On classification based on responses to n dichotomous items. In Solomon, H. (Eds.), Studies in item analysis and prediction. Calif.: Stanford University Press. 1961, 169–176Google Scholar
Birkhoff, G., Bartee, T. C.. Modern Applied Algebra, 1970, New York.: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Chow, C. K. Statistical independence and threshold functions. IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers, 1965, EC—14, 66–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 1936, 7, 179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishnan, T. On the threshold order of a Boolean function. IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers, 1965, EC—15, 369–372Google Scholar
Lewis, P. M. and Coates, C. L. Threshold Logic, 1967, New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Rao, C. R. Linear Statistical Inference and its applications, 1965, New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Sheng, C. L. Threshold Logic, 1969, New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Solomon, H. Classification procedures based on dichotomous response vectors. In Solomon, H. (Eds.), Studies in item analysis and prediction. Calif.: Stanford University Press. 1961, 177–186Google Scholar
Winder, R. O. Fundamentals of threshold logic. In Tou, J. T. (Eds.), Applied automata theory. New York: Academic Press. 1968, 235–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar