Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2rsb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T10:13:56.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Probability Model for Errors of Classification. II. Particular Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

J. P. Sutcliffe
J. P. Sutcliffe*
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

General features of a probability model for errors of classification are recapitulated as an introduction to particular cases and applications. Several models for dichotomous and nondichotomous systems are examined in sufficient detail to elaborate a procedure for dealing with any particular case. The system O = f(T, E) has empirical reference where, as statistic or parameter, probability of occasional subclass membership is given by observation, and one seeks to recover T and E values from O. A procedure for relating models and data is described. Applications of the concepts and methods are illustrated for several areas of psychological research.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 1965, pp. 129 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

With grateful acknowledgment to the Rockefeller Foundation; and to the United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, for N. I. M. H. Grant M-3950.

References

Borgatta, E. F. An error ratio for scalogram analysis. Publ. Opin. Quart., 1955, 19, 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, B. F. Attitude measurement. In Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, Cambridge: Addison-Wesley, 1954.Google Scholar
Gulliksen, H. Theory of mental tests, New York: Wiley, 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A. The advanced theory of statistics. Vol. 2, London: Griffin, 1961.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. Latent structure analysis and test theory. In Gulliksen, H. and Messick, S. (Eds.), Psychological scaling, New York: Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M. A theory of test scores. Psychometric Monograph No. 7, 1952.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R., and Galanter, E. Handbook of mathematical psychology. Vol. I, New York: Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. Measurement and prediction, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, J. P. A general method of analysis of frequency data for multiple classification designs. Psychol. Bull., 1957, 54, 134–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutcliffe, J. P. Error of measurement and the sensitivity of a test of significance. Psychometrika, 1958, 23, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutcliffe, J. P. Some aspects of rank ordering and scaling with paired comparisons data. Austral. J. Psychol., 1964, 16, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutcliffe, J. P. A probability model for errors of classification. I. General considerations. Psychometrika, 1965, 30, 73–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thurstone, L. L. The measurement of values, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Torgerson, W. S. Theory and methods of scaling, New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. Maximum validity of a test with equivalent items. Psychometrika, 1946, 11, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed