Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T16:03:50.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Quantitative Description of the Stimulus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

J. A. Lynch
J. A. Lynch*
Affiliation:
The Rice Institute, Houston, Texas
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A formula for the stimulus is derived. The essential postulates and assumptions are based on Gestalt theory.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 1938, pp. 95 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © 1938 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

* Notice the factor K as it is interpreted by diagram 2.

* The negative value of M indicated as cd can represent either oven-fatigue or deepened hypmotic sleep from which it takes time to revive any kind of activity; ac can represent activity below consciousness on the over-concentration pole; and bc can stand for lowered activity on the distraction pole. These two kinds of subconscious activity would evidently have different characteristics,Consciousness could also be defined arbitrarily by drawing the line at any desired level.

* The significance of this inequality is apparent from diagram 2.

* K, above, incorporates the factor described as statistical intelligence (equation II). As expected, when that is increased the L-curve spreads out to the right, toward greater (complexity and intensity).

* Dunlap, Knight, Habits Their Making and Unmaking. Liveright, 1932. pp. 78-80.

† Gestalts are spatio-temporal. Therefore, this statement does not necessarily rest upon the law of effect. R. H. Wheeler’s third and sixth laws could be interpreted this way.

* The objection to Dunlap’s theory is that he puts into the “response” elements which functionally belong to the “stimulus.”

* i, and i, following the formula introduced on the first page of this paper.