Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T09:34:31.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rasch's Model for Reading Speed with Manifest Explanatory Variables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Margo G. H. Jansen
Margo G. H. Jansen*
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Margo G. H. Jansen, Grote Rozenstraat 38, Department of Education RUG, 9712 TJ Groningen, THE NETHERLANDS.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In educational and psychological measurement we find the distinction between speed and power tests. Although most tests are partially speeded, the speed element is usually neglected. Here we consider a latent trait model developed by Rasch for the response time on a (set of) pure speed test(s), which is based on the assumption that the test response times are approximately gamma distributed, with known shape parameters and scale parameters depending on subject “ability” and test “difficulty” parameters. In our approach the subject parameters are treated as random variables having a common gamma distribution. From this, maximum marginal likelihood estimators are derived for the test difficulties and the parameters of the latent subject distribution. This basic model can be extended in a number of ways. Explanatory variables for the latent subject parameters and for the test parameters can be incorporated in the model. Our methods are illustrated by the analysis of a simulated and an empirical data set.

Keywords

reading speed testsRasch modelexplanatory variables

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , September 1997, pp. 393 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

I wish to thank H. Bruning, E. Wekking and P. Dingemans who kindly made their data available. I also thank the members of the Dutch Raschgroup. In particular I thank I. W. Molenaar for reading an earlier version of this article, and N. D. Verhelst for many valuable suggestions.

References

Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I. A. (1964). Handbook of mathematical functions, Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards.Google Scholar
Aitkin, M., Anderson, D., Francis, B., Hinde, J. (1990). Statistical modelling in GLIM, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, E. B., Madsen, M. (1977). Estimating the parameters of the latent population distribution. Psychometrika, 42, 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruning, H. A., Wekking, E. M., Dingemans, P. M. A. J. (1995). The Stroop Colour-Word Test: Paper versus Computerized Administration?. Psychologie & Computers, 12, 3–11.Google Scholar
Fischer, G. H., Kisser, R. (1981). Notes on the exponential latency model and an empirical application. In Wainer, H., Messick, S. (Eds.), Principles of modern psychological measurement, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jansen, M. G. H. (in press). The Rasch Model for Speed Tests and Some Extensions with Applications to Incomplete Designs. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S. (1970). Distributions in statistics. Continuous univariate distributions-1, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Maris, E. (1993). Additive and multiplicative models for gamma distributed random variables, and their application as psychometric models for response times. Psychometrika, 58, 445–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosimann, J. E. (1962). On the compound multinomial distribution, the multivariate β-distribution, and correlations among proportions. Biometrika, 49, 65–82.Google Scholar
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment test, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roskam, E. E. (1987). Towards a psychometric theory of intelligence. In Roskam, E. E., Suck, R. (Eds.), Progress in mathematical psychology, (Vol. 1) (pp. 151–174). Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Scheiblechner, H. (1979). Specifically objective stochastic latency mechanisms. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19, 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiblechner, H. (1985). Psychometric models for speed-test construction: the linear exponential model. In Embretson, S. E. (Eds.), Test design, developments in psychology and psychometrics, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thissen, D. (1982). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for the one-parameter logistic model. Psychometrika, 47, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thissen, D. (1983). Timed testing: an approach using item response theory. In Weiss, D. J. (Eds.), New horizons in testing: Latent trait theory and computerized adaptive testing (pp. 179–203). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
van Breukelen, G. J. P. (1995). Psychometric and information processing properties of selected response time models. Psychometrika, 60, 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Duijn, M. A. J., Jansen, M. G. H. (1995). Modeling repeated count data with extensions of Rasch's Poisson counts model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20, 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhelst, N., Verstralen, H., Jansen, M. G. H. (1996). Models for time-limit tests. In van der Linden, W. J., Hambleton, R. (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory, New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
White, P. O. (1973). Individual differences in speed, accuracy and persistence. In Eysenck, H. J. (Eds.), The measurement of intelligence, Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Zwinderman, A. H. (1991). A generalized Rasch model for manifest predictors. Psychometrika, 56, 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar