Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T09:33:34.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Rationale for Minimizing Distortion in Personality Questionnaire Keys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Hubert E. Brogden
Hubert E. Brogden*
Affiliation:
The Personnel Research Branch, AGO*
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A rationale and a procedure for constructing questionnaire keys so as to minimize the effect of distortion or faking by the respondents is developed. This rationale is based on the supposition that suppressor items can be identified to reduce distortion in, and thus add to, the validity of questionnaire keys. The procedure is designed primarily for application to the construction of forced choice items.

The results of an empirical test of the efficicacy of the forced choice pairing procedure developed as a consequence of this rationale are presented. A key based on forced choice pairs developed by this procedure gave a validity of .33; a second key based on forced choice pairs developed by more conventional procedures gave a validity of .23.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 1954, pp. 141 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © 1954 Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

The opinions expressed are those of the author and are not to be construed as reflecting official Department of the Army policy. The rationale presented herein was developed and used in an Army research program concerned with the selection of ROTC cadets. In substance, the content of this paper is contained in PRS Report 868, A rationale for minimizing distortion in personality questionnaire keys.

References

McKinley, J. C., Hathaway, S. R., Meehl, P. E.. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, VI. The K scale. J. consult. Psychol., 1948, 12, 20–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisson, E. D.. Forced-choice—the new Army rating. Pers. Psychol., 1948, 1, 365–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REPORTS OF THE PERSONNEL RESEARCH SECTION* THE ADJUTANT GENERAL'S OFFICE, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY.Google Scholar
PRS Report 704, Validation of a program for selection of officers for retention in the peacetime Army. July, 1945. PRS Report 764, Item analysis and development of scoring keys for the Leader'sGoogle Scholar
Course BIB, Form OCB-2, B. March, 1949. (ADI No. 3622. Microfilm copies—$1.00, photocopies—$1.35)Google Scholar
PRS Report 781. The validity of recruiter selection instruments at various points of cut. April, 1949. (ADI No. 3525. Microfilm copies—$1.00, photocopies—$1.00)Google Scholar
PRS Report 882. Validation of the West Point Personal Inventory. February, 1952. (ADI No. 3741. Microfilm copies—$1.00, photocopies—$1.80) PRS Report 958. Validation of three objectively scored pictorial tests of personality for assessment of leadership. May, 1952. (ADI No. 3975. Microfilm copies—$2.50, photocopies—$6.25)Google Scholar
PRS Report 829. Validation of the West Point Biographical Information Blank, WPB-1, against first year aptitude for service ratings. March, 1950. (ADI No. 3693. Microfilm copies—$1.00, photocopies—$2.40)Google Scholar
PRS Report 859. Construction and validation of the ROTC Self Description Blank, Forms I and II. May 1950. (ADI No. 3739. Microfilm copies—$1.00, photocopies—$3.75)Google Scholar
PRS Report 973. Measurement of interests of Army officers. August, 1951. (ADI No. 3879. Microfilm copies—$1.75, photocopies—$2.50)Google Scholar