Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T12:32:47.955Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Relation Between a Between-Item Multidimensional IRT Model and the Mixture Rasch Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Frank Rijmen  and
Paul De Boeck
Frank Rijmen*
Affiliation:
Univesity of Leuven
Paul De Boeck
Affiliation:
Univesity of Leuven
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Frank Rijmen, Department of Psychology, Univesity of Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: frank.rijmen@psy.kuleuven.ac.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two generalizations of the Rasch model are compared: the between-item multidimensional model (Adams, Wilson, and Wang, 1997), and the mixture Rasch model (Mislevy & Verhelst, 1990; Rost, 1990). It is shown that the between-item multidimensional model is formally equivalent with a continuous mixture of Rasch models for which, within each class of the mixture, the item parameters are equal to the item parameters of the multidimensional model up to a shift parameter that is specific for the dimension an item belongs to in the multidimensional model. In a simulation study, the relation between both types of models also holds when the number of classes of the mixture is as small as two. The relation is illustrated with a study on verbal aggression.

Keywords

Rasch modelmultidimensional IRT modelsmixture Rasch modelSaltus model

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 70 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 481 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Frank Rijmen was supported by the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO). This research is also funded by the GOA/2000/02 granted from the KU Leuven.

We would like to thank Kristof Vansteelandt for providing the data of the study on verbal aggression.

References

Adams, R.J., Wilson, M., Wang, W.C. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, R.D., Gibbons, R., Muraki, E. (1988). Full-information item factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, J., Verhelst, N. (1986). Maximum likelihood estimation in generalized Rasch models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, B., Clogg, C.C., Grego, J. (1991). Semiparametric estimation in the Rasch model and related exponential response models, including a simple latent class model for item analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mislevy, R.J., Verhelst, N. (1990). Modeling item responses when different subjects employ different solution strategies. Psychometrika, 55, 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mislevy, R.J., Wilson, M. (1996). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for a psychometric model of discontinuous development. Psychometrika, 61, 41–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reise, S.P., Gomel, J.N. (1995). Modeling qualitative variation within latent trait dimensions: Application of mixed-measurement to personality assessment. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 341–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rijmen, F., Tuerlinckx, F., De Boeck, P., Kuppens, P. (2003). A nonlinear mixed models framework for IRT models. Psychological Methods, 8, 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rost, J. (1990). Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches to item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute, Inc. (1999). SAS OnlineDoc (Version 8) [software manual on CD-ROM]. Cary NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.Google Scholar
Tjur, T. (1982). A connection between Rasch’s item analysis model and a multiplicative Poisson model. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 9, 23–30.Google Scholar
Vansteelandt, K. (1999). A formal model for the competency-demand hypothesis. European Journal of Personality, 13 5, Spec Issue, 429–442.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (1989). Saltus: a psychometric model of discontinuity in cognitive development. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 276–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar