Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T04:41:31.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Reliability of Linearly Equated Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Daniel O. Segall
Daniel O. Segall*
Affiliation:
Navy Personnel Research and Development Center
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Daniel O. Segall, Code 12, Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, 53335 Ryne Road, San Diego, CA 92152-7250.
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An asymptotic expression for the reliability of a linearly equated test is developed using normal theory. The reliability is expressed as the product of two terms, the reliability of the test before equating, and an adjustment term. This adjustment term is a function of the sample sizes used to estimate the linear equating transformation. The results of a simulation study indicate close agreement between the theoretical and simulated reliability values for samples greater than 200. Findings demonstrate that samples as small as 300 can be used in linear equating without an appreciable decrease in reliability.

Keywords

equatinglinear equatingtest equatingreliabilityclassical test theorymeasurement errorasymptotic standard errorstests

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , September 1994, pp. 361 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The work reported in this paper was sponsored by the Office of Naval Research Exploratory Development Program in Manpower and Personnel Technology. The author wishes to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the Author, are not official and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Navy Department.

References

Angoff, W. H. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In Thorndike, R. L. (Eds.), Educational Measurement 2nd ed., (pp. 508–600). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
Braun, H. I., Holland, P. W. (1982). Observed-score test equating: A mathematical analysis of some ETS equating procedures. In Holland, P. W., Rubin, D. B. (Eds.), Test equating (pp. 9–49). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
IMSL, (1991). International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries (Stat/Library), User's Manual, Houston, TX: Author.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S. (1970). Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Univariate Distributions I, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M. (1950). Notes on comparable scales for test scores (RB-50-48), Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Kendall, M., Stuart, A. (1977). The advanced theory of statistics 4th ed.,, New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar