Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T08:11:47.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Second Order Approximation to Sample Influence Curve in Canonical Correlation Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Wing K. Fung  and
Hong Gu
Wing K. Fung
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, The University of Hong Kong
Hong Gu*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, The University of Hong Kong
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Hong Gu, Department of Statistics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfutam Road, Hong Kong.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A second order approximation to the sample influence curve (SIC) in canonical correlation analysis has been derived in the literature. However, it does not seem satisfactory for some cases. In this paper, we present a more accurate second order approximation. As a particular case, the proposed method is exact for the SIC of the squared multiple correlation coefficient. An example is given.

Keywords

canonical correlation analysismultiple correlationinfluence functiongeneralized eigenproblem

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , September 1998 , pp. 263 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The authors are most grateful to the associate editor and three reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions which improved the presentation of the paper considerably. The first author was partly supported by a RGC earmarked research grant of Hong Kong.

References

Calder, P. (1986). Influence functions in multivariate analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kent.Google Scholar
Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and influence in regression, New York: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Hoaglin, D. C., & Welsch, R. E. (1978). The hat matrix in regression and ANOVA. The American Statistician, 32, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radhakrishnan, R., & Kshirsagar, A. M. (1981). Influence functions for certain parameters in multivariate analysis. Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods, 10, 515–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanazzi, M. (1991). Influence in canonical variates analysis. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 11, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanazzi, M. (1992). Influence in canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika, 57, 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (1990). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Cary, NC: Author.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y. (1994). Recent advance in sensitivity analysis in multivariate statistical methods. Journal of Japanese Society of Computational Statistics, 7, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Y., & Odaka, Y. (1989). Influenctial observations in principal factor analysis. Psychometrika, 54, 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, J. H. (1965). The algebraic eigenvalue problem, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar