Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T06:57:40.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Models for Individual-Group Comparisons and Group Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Stephen E. Fienberg and
F. Kinley Larntz Jr.
Stephen E. Fienberg
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago
F. Kinley Larntz Jr.
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In problem solving situations, it has been suggested the superiority of groups over individuals is due simply to the fact that groups consist of several individuals. In this paper, the Lorge and Solomon [1955] approach to such situations is reexamined using the method of maximum likelihood. Extensions to trichotomous response situations are also presented, and the resulting models are applied to data gathered by Staub [1970]. The partitioning of the likelihood ratio goodness-of-fit statistic is then discussed in order that the effects of additional variables on the response variate can be assessed. Finally, the small sample behavior of the likelihood ratio statistic is examined.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , December 1971, pp. 349 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © 1971 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This research was supported in part by Research Contract No. NSF GS-2818 from the Division of Social Sciences of the National Science Foundation to the Department of Statistics, The University of Chicago.

†

Now at the University of Minnesota.

References

Goodman, L. A. On partitioning chi-square and detecting partial association. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 1969, 31, 486–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, L. A. The multivariate analysis of qualitative data: Interactions among multiple classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1970, 65, 226–25610.1080/01621459.1970.10481076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, L. R. Group problem solving. In Berkowitz, L. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2, 1965, New Work: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Ku, H. H., & Kullback, S.. Interaction in multidimensional contingency tables: An information theoretic approach. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, B, 1968, 72, 159–199Google Scholar
Kullback, S. Information theory and statistics, 1959, New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar
Kullback, S., Kupperman, M., & Ku, H. H. An application of information theory to the analysis of contingency tables with a table of 2N ln N, N=1 (1) 10,000. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, B, 1962, 66, 217–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. Bystander “apathy”. American Scientist, 1969, 57, 244–268Google ScholarPubMed
Lorge, I., Fox, D., Davitz, J., & Brenner, M. A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920–1957. Psychological Bulletin, 1958, 55, 337–372CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorge, I., & Solomon, H. Two models of group behavior in the solution of Eureka-type problems. Psychometrika, 1955, 20, 139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorge, I., & Solomon, H. Group and individual behavior in free-recall verbal learning. Mathematical methods in small group processes, 1962, Stanford: Stanford Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. W. Data analysis, including statistics. In Lindsey, G. and Aronson, E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, Vol. II, 1968, Reading, Mass.: Addison WesleyGoogle Scholar
Neyman, J. Contribution to the theory of the χ2 test. Proceedings of the Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, 1949, 239–273.Google Scholar
Rao, C. R. Linear statistical inference and its applications, 1965, New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar
Shaw, M. E. Comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. American Journal of Psychology, 1932, 44, 491–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staub, E. A child in distress: The influence of age and number of witnesses on children's attempts to help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 14, 130–14010.1037/h0028752CrossRefGoogle Scholar