Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zkb6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T13:25:16.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Statistical Methods for a General Theory of All-or-None Learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Peter G. Polson
Peter G. Polson*
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greeno and Steiner have shown that a three state Markov Chain with a single absorbing state is equivalent to many of the current formalizations of All-or-None learning theories. Distribution statistics and other summary statistics are derived from the general model. Expressions for the maximum likelihood estimators of its parameters and the sampling variances of the estimates are presented. Likelihood ratio tests for several different null hypotheses are derived. These tests permit one to evaluate the usual null hypotheses in terms of the parameters of a process model.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , March 1970, pp. 51 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This research was supported in part by a USPHS Predoctoral Research Fellowship, 1-F1-MH-31-289-01, by a grant from the Graduate School of the University of Texas, and by grant HD-02212-01 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to Dr. John Theios.

References

Atkinson, R. C., & Crothers, E. J. A comparison of paired-associates learning models having different acquisition and retention axioms. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1964, 1, 285–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernbach, H. A. A forgetting model for paired-associate learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1965, 2, 128–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, G. H. Application of a model to paired-associates learning. Psychometrika, 1961, 26, 255–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, G. H. An association model for response and training variables in paired-associate learning. Psychological Review, 1962, 69, 34–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bower, G. H., & Trabasso, T. R. Concept identification. In Atkinson, R. C. (Eds.), Studies in Mathematical Psychology. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 1964, 32–94.Google Scholar
Estes, W. K. Learning theory and the new “mental chemistry”. Psychological Review, 1960, 67, 207–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, S. Introduction to Difference Equations, 1958, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Greeno, J. G. Paired associates learning with short term retention: Mathematical analysis and data regarding identification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1967, 4, 430–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greeno, J. G., & Scandura, J. M. All-or-none transfer based on verbally mediated concepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1967, 3, 388–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greeno, J. G., & Steiner, T. E. Markovian processes with identifiable states: General considerations and application to all-or-none learning. Psychometrika, 1964, 29, 309–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greeno, J. G., & Steiner, T. E. Comments on ‘Markovian processes with identifiable states: General considerations and applications to all-or-none learning’. Psychometrika, 1968, 33, 169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, R., & Craig, A. Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, 1959, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kemeny, J. G., & Snell, J. L. Finite Markov Chains, 1960, Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Kendall, M. G., & Stuart, A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. II, 2nd Ed., London: C. Griffin, 1967.Google Scholar
Restle, F. Statistical methods for a theory of cue learning. Psychometrika, 1961, 26, 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restle, F. The selection of strategies in cue learning. Psychological Review, 1962, 69, 329–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Restle, F. The significance of all-or-none learning. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 64, 313–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suppes, P., & Ginsberg, R. A fundamental property of all-or-none models, binomial distribution of responses prior to conditioning, with application to concept formation in children. Psychological Review, 1963, 70, 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, N. C., & Norman, D. A. Primary memory. Psychological Review, 1965, 72, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed