Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T21:04:26.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Statistical Model which Combines Features of Factor Analytic and Analysis of Variance Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Harry F. Gollob
Harry F. Gollob*
Affiliation:
Mental Health Research Institute, University of Michigan
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes a method of matrix decomposition which retains the ability of factor analytic techniques to summarize data in terms of a relatively low number of coordinates; but at the same time, does not sacrifice the useful analysis of variance heuristic of partitioning data matrices into independent sources of variation which are relatively simple to interpret. The basic model is essentially a two-way analysis of variance model which requires that the matrix of interaction parameters be decomposed by using factor analytic techniques. Problems of judging statistical significance are discussed; and an illustrative example is presented.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , March 1968, pp. 73 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © 1968 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Much of the work on this paper was completed while the author held a U.S.P.H.S. Postdoctoral Fellowship at Yale University (1964–65). Many of the ideas in this paper have been discussed in the author's doctoral dissertation which was submitted to Yale University in 1965.

†

Special thanks are due to Robert P. Abelson for his encouragement and for many helpful and stimulating discussions about problems which arose in the preparation of this paper. I would also like to thank Francis J. Anscombe and Alan T. James for their valuable suggestions and constructive criticism of an earlier draft of this article.

References

Abelson, R. P. Computer simulation of “hot” cognition. In Tomkins, S. S. and Messick, S. (Eds.), Computer simulation of personality. New York: Wiley, 1963, 277–298.Google Scholar
Burt, C. Correlations between persons. British Journal of Psychology, 1937, 28, 59–95.Google Scholar
Burt, C. A comparison of factor analysis and analysis of variance. British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section, 1947, 1, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, C. The appropriate uses of factor analysis and analysis of variance. In Cattell, R. B. (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966, 267–287.Google Scholar
Creasy, Monica A. Analysis of variance as an alternative to factor analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 1957, 19, 318–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckart, C., and Young, G. The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank. Psychometrika, 1936, 1, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollob, H. F. A combined additive and multiplicative model of word combination in sentences. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, 1965.Google Scholar
Green, B. F., and Tukey, J. W. Complex analyses of variance: General problems. Psychometrika, 1960, 25, 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, H. H. Modern factor analysis, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Hays, W. L. Statistics for psychologists, New York: Holt, 1963.Google Scholar
Heider, F. On social cognition. American Psychologist, 1967, 22, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horst, P. Matrix algebra for social scientists, New York: Holt, 1963.Google Scholar
Mandel, J. Non-additivity in two-way analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1961, 56, 878–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffé, H. A. The analysis of variance, New York: Wiley, 1959.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. Statistical methods applied to experiments in agriculture and biology (5th edition), Ames, Iowa: Iowa State College Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Tukey, J. W. One degree of freedom for nonadditivity. Biometrics, 1949, 5, 232–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tukey, J. W. The future of data analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1962, 33, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winer, B. J. Statistical principles in experimental design, New York: McGraw, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar