Correspondence should be made to Yi Feng, Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, 3942 Campus Drive, College Park, MD 20742-1115, USA. Email: yifeng94@umd.edu
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
Asparouhov, T.,
Hamaker, E. L., &
Muthén, B.
(2018).
Dynamic structural equation models.
Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,
25,
359–
388.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, K. A.
(1989).
Structural equations with latent variables.
New York, NY:
Wiley.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. M.
(2013).
Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, K. J.,
Ram, N., &
Estabrook, R.
(2016).
Growth modeling: Structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches.
New York, NY:
Guilford Publications.
Google Scholar
Hancock, G. R., &
Mueller, R. O.Hancock, G. R.,
Stapleton, L. M., &
Mueller, R. O.
(2019).
Structural equation modeling.
The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences2.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
445–
456.
Google Scholar
Jedidi, K.,
Jagpal, H. S., &
DeSarbo, W. S.
(1997).
Finite-mixture structural equation models for response-based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity.
Marketing Science,
16,
39–
59.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, D.,
Elliott, P. R.
(1997).
A didactic example of multilevel structural equation modeling applicable to the study of organizations.
Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,
4,
1–
24.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelloway, E. K.
(2014).
Using Mplus for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide.
Thousand Oaks:
Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Kline, R. B.
(2016).
Principles and practice of structural equation modeling4.
New York, NY:
Guilford Publications.
Google Scholar
Lord, F. M.
(1980).
Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
Google Scholar
Mueller, R. O., &
Hancock, G. R.
(2013).
Structural equation modeling: A second course2.
Charlotte, NC:
Information Age Publishing.
Google Scholar
Muthén, B.
(1978).
Contributions to factor analysis of dichotomous variables.
Psychometrika,
43,
551–
560.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, B. O.Marcoulides, G.&
Schumacker, R.Latent variable mixture modeling.
New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling,
(2001).
New York, NY:
Psychology Press.
21–
54.
Google Scholar
Muthén, L. K., &
Muthén, B. O.
(1998-2017).
Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Newsom, J. T.
(2015).
Longitudinal structural equation modeling: A comprehensive introduction.
New York, NY:
Taylor & Francis.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F.
(1969).
Estimation of a latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores.
Psychometrika,
34,
1–
97.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samejima, F.van der Linden, W. J.
(2016).
Graded response models.
Handbook of item response theory,
New York, NY:
Chapman and Hall/CRC.
123–
136.
Google Scholar
Silva, B. C.,
Bosancianu, C. M., &
Littvay, L.
(2020).
Multilevel structural equation modeling.
Los Angeles, CA:
SAGE Publications.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar