Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T15:49:24.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three-Way Tucker2 Component Analysis Solutions of Stimuli × Responses × Individuals Data with Simple Structure and the Fewest Core Differences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Kohei Adachi
Kohei Adachi*
Affiliation:
Osaka University
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to Kohei Adachi, Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, 1-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan. E-mail: adachi@hus.osaka-u.ac.jp
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Multivariate stimulus-response designs can be described by a three-way array of stimuli by responses by individuals. Its underlying structure can be represented by a network based on the Tucker2 component model in which stimulus components are connected with response components by means of the links that differ between individuals. For each individual such links are represented in a slice of the extended core array. For a proper understanding of these links, it is desirable that [1] the individual core slices as well as the component matrices have simple structures and [2] the differences of core slices between individuals are as few as possible. For attaining [1] and [2] we propose a method in which both the component matrices and the core slices of a Tucker2 solution are transformed simultaneously in order that the component matrices match simple target matrices and the core slices are summarized by a simple target slice. The proposed method is evaluated in a simulation study and illustrated with a three-way data array of semantic differential ratings.

Keywords

three-way component analysisTucker2 modelstimuli × responses × individuals datasimplimaxpromaxjoint Procrustes analysis

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , April 2011, pp. 285 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The author would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers. This research was supported by grant (C)-20500256 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

References

Adachi, K. (2007). Joint Procrustes analysis and three-way component analysis for the data array of stimuli by responses by persons. IMPS 2007 (International Meeting of Psychometric Society 2007) Abstracts, 96.Google Scholar
Adachi, K. (2009). Joint Procrustes analysis for simultaneous nonsingular transformation of component score and loading matrices. Psychometrika, 74, 667–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, P., Kroonenberg, P.M. (1991). Some notes on the diagonalization of the extended three-mode core matrix. Journal of Classification, 8, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceulemans, E., Kiers, H.A.L. (2006). Selecting among three-mode principal component models of different types and complexities: A numerical convex hull based method. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crawford, C.B., Ferguson, G.A. (1970). A general rotation criterion and its use in orthogonal rotation. Psychometrika, 35, 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harshman, R.A. (1970). Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: Models and conditions for an “exploratory” multi-mode factor analysis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 16, 1–84.Google Scholar
Harshman, R.A., Lundy, M.E. (1984). Data preprocessing and the extended PARAFAC model. In Law, H.G., Snyder, C.W. Jr., Hattie, J.A., McDonald, R.P. (Eds.), Research methods for multimode data analysis (pp. 216–284). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, A.E., White, P.O. (1964). PROMAX: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 17, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiers, H.A.L. (1991). Hierarchical relations among three-way methods. Psychometrika, 56, 449–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiers, H.A.L. (1994). Simplimax: Oblique rotation to an optimal target with simple structure. Psychometrika, 59, 567–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiers, H.A.L. (1998). Three-way SIMPLIMAX for oblique rotation of the three-mode factor analysis core to simple structure. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 28, 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiers, H.A.L. (1998). Joint orthomax rotation of the core and component matrices resulting from three-mode principal component analysis. Journal of Classification, 15, 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiers, H.A.L., ten Berge, J.M.F. (1992). Minimization of a class of matrix trace functions by means of refined majorization. Psychometrika, 57, 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiers, H.A.L., Van Mechelen, I. (2001). Three-way component analysis: Principles and illustrative application. Psychological Methods, 6, 84–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroonenberg, P.M. (1983). Three-mode principal component analysis: Theory and applications, Leiden: DSWO Press.Google Scholar
Kroonenberg, P.M. (2008). Applied multiway data analysis, New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroonenberg, P.M., de Leeuw, J. (1980). Principal component analysis of three-mode data by means of alternating least squares algorithms. Psychometrika, 45, 69–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, T. (1983). Quasi three-model principal component analysis: A method for assessing the factor change. Behaviormetrika, No. 14, 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, T., Kroonenberg, P.M. (2003). Three-mode models and individual differences in semantic differential data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 247–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957). The measurement of meaning, Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Seber, G.A.F. (2008). A matrix handbook for statisticians, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Smilde, A., Bro, R., Geladi, P. (2004). Multi-way analysis: Applications in the chemical sciences, New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, L.R. (1966). Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 31, 279–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed