Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T09:17:41.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two New Test Statistics for the Rasch Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2025

Arnold L. van den Wollenberg
Arnold L. van den Wollenberg*
Affiliation:
University of Nijmegen
*
Requests for reprints should be sent to: Dr. A. L. van den Wollenberg, Department of Psychology, P. O. Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is shown that the presently available statistical tests for the Rasch model are insensitive to violation of the unidimensionality axiom. Two new test statistics are presented. The first one, Q1, is sensitive to the same effects as the presently available statistics, but has some desirable properties of a nonstatistical nature. The second statistic, Q2, is sensitive to violation of local stochastic independence and unidimensionality and thus fills an existing gap.

Keywords

unidimensionality axiom

Information

Type
Original Paper
Information
Psychometrika , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , June 1982 , pp. 123 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 The Psychometric Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Reference Notes

Martin Löf, P. Statistika Modeller, Anteckningar från seminarier Lasåret 1969–1970 utarbetade av Rolf Sunberg obetydligt ändrat nytryk, oktober 1973. Institutet för Försäkringsmatematik och Matematisk Statistik vid Stockholms Universitet, 1973.Google Scholar
Allerup, P. & Sorber, G. The Rasch model for questionnaires. With a computer program, 2nd ed., Copenhagen: The Danish Institute for Educational Research, 1977.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, J. E. & Lindblad, T. The Rasch model for dichotomous items: A solution of the conditional estimation problem for long tests and some thoughts about item screening procedures. Paper presented at the European Conference on Psychometrics and Mathematical Psychology, Uppsala, June 15–17, 1978.Google Scholar
Wollenberg, van den, A. L. On the Wright-Panchapakesan goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Intern Rapport 80-MA-02, K.U. Nijmegen, 1980.Google Scholar
Molenaar, I. W. Some improved diagnostics for failure of the Rasch model. Heymans Bulletin 80-482-EX, 1980.Google Scholar

References

Andersen, E. B. A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 1973, 38, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, G. H. Einführung in die Theorie psychologischer Tests, 1974, Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
Fischer, G. H. & Scheiblechner, H. H. Algorithmen und Programmen für das probabilistische Testmodel von Rasch. Psychologische Beiträge, 1970, 12, 23–51.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, J. E. Testing and obtaining fit of data to the Rasch model. British Jorunal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1980, 32, 205–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasch, G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests, 1960, Kopenhagen: Nielsen & Lydiche.Google Scholar
Rasch, G. An informal report on a theory of objectivity in comparisons. In: van der Kamp, L. T. J. & Vlek, C. A. J. (Eds.), Psychological measurement theory, proceedings of the NUFFIC international summer session in science at “Het Oude Hof” The Hague, July 14–28, 1966. (a).Google Scholar
Rasch, G. An individual-centered approach to item analysis with two categories of answers. In: van der Kamp, L. J. T. & Vlek, C. A. J. (Eds.), Psychological measurement theory, proceedings of the NUFFIC international session of science at “Het Oude Hof” The Hague, July 14–28, 1966. (b).Google Scholar
Rasch, G. An individualistic approach to item analysis. In Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (Eds.), Readings in mathematical social science, 1966, Chicago: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Rasch, G. An item analysis that takes individual differences into account. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1966, 19, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stelzl, I. Ist der Modelltest des Rasch-Modells geeignet, Homogenitäts Hypothesen zu prüfen? Ein Bericht über Simulation Studien mit inhomogene Daten. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 1979, XXVI, 652–672.Google Scholar
van den Wollenberg, A. L. The Rasch model and time limit tests, 1979, Nijmegen: Studentenpers.Google Scholar
Wright, B. D. & Panchapakesan, N. A procedure for sample-free item analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1969, 29, 23–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar