Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-13T10:20:22.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atmospheric Radiocarbon: Implications for the Geomagnetic Dipole Moment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

R S Sternberg and
P E Damon
R S Sternberg*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
P E Damon
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry, Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
*
∗ Now at Department of Geology, Franklin and Marshall College P O Box 3003, Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The geomagnetic field is one of the major physical fields of the earth. Because its source is fluid motion in the outer core, it exhibits temporal changes, called secular variation, which are quite rapid compared to most geologic phenomena. The prehistoric secular variation is usually inferred from paleomagnetic data. We will discuss here how changes in the atmospheric 14C content can be used to gain additional insight into the behavior of the dipole moment over the past 8500 years. By rewriting the differential equations representing the 14C geochemical cycle in finite-difference form, we are able to convert the atmospheric 14C activity record into an equivalent radiocarbon dipole moment.

Information

Type
I. Natural 14C Variations
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 25 , Issue 2: 11th International Radiocarbon Conference , 1983, pp. 239 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Barton, D E, Merrill, R T, and Barbetti, M, 1979, Intensity of the earth's magnetic field over the last 10 000 years: Physics Earth Planetary Interiors, v 20, p 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burlatskaya, S P, Nachasova, I E, Uechaeva, T B, Rusakov, O M, Zagniv, G F, Tarhov, E N, and Tchelidze, Z A, 1970, Archaeomagnetic research in the U S S R: Recent results and spectral analysis: Archaeometry, v 12, p 73–85.Google Scholar
Champion, D E, 1980, Holocene geomagnetic secular variation in the western United States: Implications for the global geomagnetic field: U S Geol Survey open-file rept 80–824, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Cohen, T J and Lintz, P R, 1974, Long term periodicities in the sunspot cycle: Nature, v 250, p 393–399.Google Scholar
Damon, P E, 1970, Climatic versus magnetic perturbation of the atmospheric C14 reservoir, in Olsson, I U, ed, Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology: John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 571–593.Google Scholar
Damon, P E, Lerman, J C, and Long, A, 1978, Temporal fluctuations of atmospheric 14C: Causal factors and implications: Ann Rev Earth Planetary Sci, v 6, p 457–494.Google Scholar
Damon, P E, Sternberg, R S, and Radnell, C J, 1983, Modeling atmospheric radiocarbon fluctuations for the past three centuries in Stuiver, Minze and Kra, Renee eds, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 11th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsasser, W, Ney, E P, and Winckler, J R, 1956, Cosmic-ray intensity and geomagnetism: Nature, v 178, p 1226–1227.Google Scholar
Games, K P, 1980, The magnitude of the archaeomagnetic field in Egypt between 3000 and 0 BC: Geophys Jour Royal Astron Soc, v 63, p 45–56.Google Scholar
Houtermans, J C, ms, 1971, Geophysical interpretations of bristlecone pine radiocarbon measurements using a method of Fourier analysis of unequally spaced data: unpub PhD dissert, Univ Bern.Google Scholar
Houtermans, J C, Suess, H E, and Oeschger, H, 1973, Reservoir models and production rate variations of natural radiocarbon: Jour Geophys Research, v 78, p 1897–1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deJong, A F M, Mook, W G, and Becker, B, 1979, Confirmation of the Suess wiggles: 3200–3700 BC: Nature, v 280, p 48–49.Google Scholar
Kigoshi, K and Hasegawa, H, 1966, Secular variation of atmospheric radiocarbon concentration and its dependence on geomagnetism: Jour Geophys Research, v 71, p 1056–1071.Google Scholar
Klein, J, Lerman, J C, Damon, P E, and Linick, T W, 1980, Radiocarbon concentration in the atmosphere: 8000 year record of variations in tree rings: first results of a U S A workshop, in Stuiver, Minze and Kra, Renee, eds, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no 3, p 950–961.Google Scholar
Lazear, G, Damon, P E, and Sternberg, R, 1980, The concept of DC again in modeling secular variations in atmospheric 14C, in Stuiver, Minze, and Kra, Renee, eds, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no 2, p 318–327.Google Scholar
Libby, W F, 1967, Radiocarbon and paleomagnetism, in Hindmarsh, W R, Lowes, F J, Roberts, P H, and Runcorn, S K, eds, Magnetism and the cosmos: New York, Am Elsevier, p 60–65.Google Scholar
Lingenfelter, R E and Ramaty, R, 1970, Astrophysical and geophysical variations in C14 production, in Olsson, I U, ed, Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology: New York, John Wiley and Sons, p 513–537.Google Scholar
McDonald, K and Gunst, R, 1967, An analysis of the earth's magnetic field from 1835 to 1965: ESSA tech rept IER 46-IFS 1, Washington, US Govt Printing Office, 87 P.Google Scholar
Neftel, A, Oeschger, H, and Suess, H E, 1981, Secular non-random variations of cosmogenic carbon-14 in the terrestrial atmosphere: Earth Planetary Sci Letters, v 56, p 127–147.Google Scholar
Ramaty, R, 1967, The influence of geomagnetic shielding on C14 production and content, in Hindmarsh, W R, Lowes, F J, Roberts, P H, and Runcorn, S K, eds, Magnetism and the cosmos: New York, Am Elsevier, p 66–78.Google Scholar
Siegenthaler, U, Heimann, M, and Oeschger, H, 1980, 14C variations caused by changes in the global carbon cycle, in Stuiver, Minze, and Kra, Renee, eds, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no 2, p 177–191.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R S and Damon, P E, 1979, Sensitivity of radiocarbon fluctuations and inventory to geomagnetic and reservoir parameters, in Berger, Rainer and Suess, E, eds, Radiocarbon dating, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 9th, Proc: Berkeley, Univ California Press, p 691–717.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R S, 1981, A finite-difference solution for the radiocarbon dipole moment: EOS, v 62, p. 272 Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze and Quay, P D, 1980a, Patterns of atmospheric 14C changes, in Stuiver, Minze and Kra, Renee, eds, Internatl radiocarbon conf, 10th Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no 2, p 166–176.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R S, 1980b, Changes in atmospheric carbon-14 attributed to a variable sun: Science, v 207, p 11–19.Google Scholar
Suess, H E, 1970, The three causes of the secular C14 fluctuations, their amplitudes and time constants, in Olsson, I U, ed, Radiocarbon variations and absolute chronology: New York, John Wiley and Sons, p 595–605.Google Scholar
Yukutake, T, 1971, Spherical harmonic analysis of the earth's magnetic field for the 17th and 18th centuries; Jour Geomagnetism Geoelectricity, v 23, p 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar