Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T23:42:14.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Counting Statistics and Ion Interval Density in AMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

John S Vogel ,
Ted Ognibene ,
Magnus Palmblad  and
Paula Reimer
John S Vogel*
Affiliation:
Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA.
Ted Ognibene
Affiliation:
Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA.
Magnus Palmblad
Affiliation:
Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA.
Paula Reimer
Affiliation:
Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA.
*
Corresponding author. Email: jsvogel@llnl.gov.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Confidence in the precisions of accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) and decay measurements must be comparable for the application of the radiocarbon calibration to age determinations using both technologies. We confirmed the random nature of the temporal distribution of 14C ions in an AMS spectrometer for a number of sample counting rates and properties of the sputtering process. The temporal distribution of ion counts was also measured to confirm the applicability of traditional counting statistics.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 46 , Issue 3: IntCal04: Calibration Issue, Guest Editor: PAULA J REIMER , 2004 , pp. 1103 - 1109
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Bard, E, Hamelin, B, Fairbanks, RG, Zindler, A. 1990. Calibration of the 14C time scale over the past 30,000 years using mass spectrometric U-Th ages from the Barbados corals. Nature 345:405–10.Google Scholar
Bard, E, Rostek, F, Ménot-Combes, G. 2004. Radiocarbon calibration beyond 20,000 14C yr BP by means of planktonic foraminifera of the Iberian Margin. Quaternary Research 61:204–14.Google Scholar
Beck, JW, Richards, DA, Edwards, RL, Silverman, BW, Smart, PL, Donahue, DJ, Hererra-Osterheld, S, Burr, GS, Calsoyas, L, Jull, AJT, Biddulph, D. 2001. Extremely large variations of atmospheric 14C concentration during the last glacial period. Science 292: 2453–8.Google Scholar
Berno, AJ, Vogel, JS, Caffee, M. 1991. High-speed data acquisition of multi-parameter data using a Macintosh IIcx. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 56:1076–9.Google Scholar
Bonani, G, Beer, J, Hofmann, H, Synal, H-A, Suter, M, Wölfli, W, Pfleiderer, C, Kromer, B, Junghans, C, Münnich, KO. 1987. Fractionation, precision and accuracy in 14C and 13C measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 29:87–90.Google Scholar
Buchholz, BA, Freeman, SPHT, Haack, KW, Vogel, JS. 2000. Tips and traps in the 14C bio-AMS preparation laboratory. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172:404–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carloni, F, Corberi, A, Marseguerra, M, Porceddu, CM. 1970. The asymptotic method of dead time correction in Poissania distribution. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 78:70–6.Google Scholar
Donahue, D, Jull, AJT, Zabel, TH. 1984. Results of radio-isotope measurements at NSF-University of Arizona tandem accelerator mass spectrometry facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5:162–6.Google Scholar
Farwell, GW, Grootes, PM, Leach, DD, Schmidt, FH. 1984. The accelerator mass spectrometry facility at the University of Washington: current status and application to a 14C profile of a tree ring. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5:144–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughen, KA, Overpeck, JT, Lehman, SJ, Kashgarian, M, Southon, JR, Peterson, LC, Alley, R, Sigman, DM. 1998. Deglacial changes in ocean circulation from an extended radiocarbon calibration. Nature 391:65–8.Google Scholar
Hughen, KA, Lehman, S, Southon, J, Overpeck, J, Marchal, O, Herring, C, Turnbull, J. 2004. 14C activity and global carbon cycle changes over the past 50,000 years. Science 303:202–7.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, H, van der Plicht, J. 1998. Atmospheric radiocarbon calibration to 45,000 yr BP—Late Glacial fluctuations and cosmogenic isotope production. Science 279:1187–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, JW. 1991. Generalized dead times. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 301: 543–51.Google Scholar
Nadeau, MJ, Kieser, WE, Buekens, RP, Litherland, AE. 1987. Quantum mechanical effects on sputter source isotope fractionation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 29:83–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, MJ, Litherland, AE. 1990. Electric dissociation of negative ions. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 52:387–90.Google Scholar
Ogborne, J, Collins, S, Brown, M. 2003. Randomness at the root of things: random walks. Physics Education 38:391–7.Google Scholar
Ognibene, TJ, Brown, TA, Knezovich, JP, Roberts, ML, Southon, JR, Vogel, JS. 2000. Ion-optics calculations of the LLNL AMS system for biochemical 14C measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172:47–51.Google Scholar
Ognibene, TJ, Bench, G, Brown, TA, Peaslee, GF, Vogel, JS. 2002. A new accelerator mass spectrometry system for 14C-quantification of biochemical samples. Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes 218:255–64.Google Scholar
Ognibene, TJ, Bench, G, Vogel, JS, Peaslee, GF, Murov, S. 2003. A high-throughput method for the conversion of CO2 obtained from biochemical samples to graphite in septa-sealed vials for quantification of 14C via accelerator mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 75:2192–6.Google Scholar
Rutherford, E, Geiger, H. 1910. The probability variations in the distribution of alpha-particles. Philosophical Magazine 20:698–707.Google Scholar
Southon, JR, Roberts, ML. 2000. Ten years of sourcery at CAMS/LLNL: evolution of a Cs ion source. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172: 257–61.Google Scholar
Suter, M, Balzer, R, Bonani, G, Hofmann, H, Morenzoni, E, Nessi, M, Wölfli, W, Andreé, M, Beer, J, Oeschger, H. 1984. Precision measurements of 14C in AMS—some results and prospects. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5:117–22.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5:289–93.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE. 1987. Catalyst and binder effects in the use of filamentous graphite for AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 29:50–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, JS. 1992. Rapid production of graphite without contamination for biomedical AMS. Radiocarbon 34(3):344–50.Google Scholar
Wölfli, W, Bonani, G, Suter, M, Balzer, R, Nessie, M, Stoller, C, Beer, J, Oeschger, H, Andreé, M. 1983. Radioisotope dating with the ETHZ EN tandem accelerator. Radiocarbon 25(2):745–54.Google Scholar