Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T13:56:13.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liquid Scintillation 14C Spectrometry: Errors and Assurances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Henry Polach
Henry Polach*
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Dating Research Unit, Research School of Pacific Studies Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Liquid scintillation (LS) 14C spectrometry, using ultra low-level, high-efficiency and resolution α and β particle detection equipment is seen as an excellent tool supporting future 14C radiometry. Modern technology ensures electronic excellence: high-precision, small-sample (100mg) dating ability, flexibility of use for the detection of α and β particle emitting radioisotopes at and below natural abundance levels. Multiple applications to environmental research, supported by elegant software and commercial availability, are its attributes. However, mastering the new technology takes time as lessons learned in gas-proportional 14C radiometry and high-background counting are not directly applicable to ultra low-level 14C LS spectrometry using benzene as the counting medium. That discordant results can be obtained by any technique based on physical measurement is well established. This is demonstrated for 14C age determination by reference to an international cross-check organized by the University of Glasgow. Reasons for aberrations are explored and the question is raised if it is not timely to introduce the type of quality assurance practiced by other analytical disciplines. Better results will not only serve the daters and users but will generally enhance the value of worldwide 14C research.

Information

Type
I. Sample Preparation and Measurement Techniques
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 31 , Issue 3: June 20-25, 1988 Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia , 1989 , pp. 327 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Currie, L A, 1988, Detection in analytical chemistry: importance, theory and practice: Am Chem Soc, Washington, DC, 55 p.Google Scholar
Currie, L A and Paar, R M, 1988, Perspectives on detection limits for nuclear measurements in selected national and international programs: Am Chem Soc. Chap 9, 60 p.Google Scholar
Gupta, S K and Polach, H A, 1985, Radiocarbon dating practices at ANU: Radiocarbon Dating Research, Canberra, 176 p.Google Scholar
Haas, H, 1979, Specific problems with liquid scintillation counting of small benzene volumes and background count rate estimations, in Berger, R and Suess, H E, eds, Radiocarbon dating, Internatl 14C conf, 9th, Proc: Los Angeles, Univ California Press, p 246–255.Google Scholar
Hood, D, Hatfield, R, Patrick, C, Stipp, J, Tamers, M, Leidl, R, Lyons, B, Polach, H, Robertson, S and Zhou, W, 1989, Radon elimination during benzene preparation for radiocarbon dating by liquid scintillation spectrometry: Radiocarbon, this issue.Google Scholar
Kaihola, L, Kananen, R, Kojola, H and Suontausta, J (ms), 1988, Evaluation of environmental background components in low-level liquid scintillation spectrometry: Paper presented at Internatl 14C conf, 13th, Dubrovnik, June 20–25.Google Scholar
Noakes, J E and Valenta, R J, 1989, Low background liquid scintillation counting using an active sample holder and pulse discrimination electronics: Radiocarbon, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oikari, T, Kojola, H, Nurmi, J and Kaihola, L, 1987, Simultaneous counting of low alpha- and beta-particle activities with liquid-scintillation spectrometry pulse-shape analysis: Internatl Jour Applied Radiation Isotopes, v 38, no. 10, p 875–878.Google Scholar
Otlet, R L and Polach, H A, in press, Improvements in the precision of radiocarbon dating through the recent development in liquid scintillation counters, in Archaeology and 14C, Internatl symposium, Proc, 2nd: PACT.Google Scholar
Pearson, G W, 1979, Precise 14C measurement by liquid scintillation counting: Radiocarbon, v 21, no. 1, p 1–21.Google Scholar
Polach, H A, 1972, Cross checking of NBS oxalic and secondary laboratory dating standards, in Rafter, A T and Grant-Taylor, T, eds, Internatl 14C dating conf, 8th, Proc: Wellington, Royal Soc New Zealand, p 688–717.Google Scholar
Polach, H A, 1987, Perspectives in radiocarbon dating by radiometry, in Gove, H E, Litherland, A E and Elmore, D, eds, Internatl symposium on accelerator mass spectrometry, Proc: Nuclear Instruments & Methods, v B29, no. 1, 2, p 415–423.Google Scholar
Polach, H A and Kaihola, L, 1988, Determination of radon by liquid scintillation α/β particle spectrometry: Radiocarbon, v 30, no. 1, p 19–24.Google Scholar
Polach, H A, Kaihola, L, Robertson, S and Haas, H, 1988, Small sample 14C dating by liquid scintillation spectrometry: Radiocarbon, v 30, no. 2, p 153–155.Google Scholar
Polach, H A and Krueger, H A, 1972, Isotopic fractionation of NBS oxalic acid and ANU-sucrose radiocarbon dating standards, in Rafter, A T and Grant-Taylor, T, eds, Internatl 14C dating conf, 8th, Proc: Wellington, Royal Soc New Zealand, p 718–724.Google Scholar
Polach, H A, Robertson, S, Butterfield, D, Gower, J and Soini, E, 1983, The windowless approach to scintillation counting: low-level 14C as an example, in McQuarrie, S A, Ediss, C and Wiebe, L I, eds, Advances in scintillation counting: Univ Alberta Press, p 494–507.Google Scholar
Scott, E M, Baxter, M S, Harkness, D D, Aitchison, T C and Cook, G T, in press, Recent progress in the international calibration of radiocarbon laboratories, in Archaeology and 14C, Internatl symposium, 2nd Proc: PACT.Google Scholar