Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T03:20:17.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radioisotopes Laboratory Radiocarbon Date List I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

A J Sumodi
A J Sumodi*
Affiliation:
Dicar Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio 44116
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The Radioisotopes Laboratory was established in January 1972, in order to supply radiocarbon measurements of various samples to several institutions. Active analyses commenced in June following the testing and evaluation of equipment and known samples for accuracy and reproducibility. During this time, data was accumulated for the statistical establishment of counting accuracy, particularly for background activity.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , 1974, pp. 166 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Durrell, R H, 1961, The Pleistocene geology of the Cincinnati area, Field Trip 3, in: Geol Soc America Guidebook for Field Trips, New York, Geol Soc America, p 47–57.Google Scholar
Fitting, James, 1964, Ceramic relationships of four Late Woodland sites in northern Ohio: The Wisconsin Archaeologist, v 45, p 160–175.Google Scholar
Greenman, E F, 1937, Two Prehistoric villages near Cleveland, Ohio: Ohio State Archaeol and Hist Quart, v 46, p 305–366.Google Scholar
Griffin, J E, 1943, The Fort Ancient aspect: Ann Arbor, Michigan, Univ Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Haynes, C V, 1967, Bone organic matter and radioactive dating, in: Symposium of radioactive dating and methods of low level counting, Proc, IAEA, 1967, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Krueger, H W, 1965, Preservation and dating of collagen in ancient bone, in: 6th internatl conf on radiocarbon and tritium dating, Proc, USAEC conf—650652, Pullman, Washington.Google Scholar
Lowdon, J A, Wilmeth, R, and Blake, W Jr, 1969, Geological Survey of Canada radiocarbon date list VIII: Radiocarbon, v 11, p 22–42.Google Scholar
Michael, H W, and Ralph, E K, 1970, Dating techniques for the archaeologist: Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, p 15.Google Scholar
Noakes, J E, 1971, Modern aspects of liquid scintillation counting, in: Neary, M P (ed), Liquid scintillation: Fullerton, California, Beckman Instruments, Inc, p 8-1–8-22.Google Scholar
Noakes, J E, Kim, S M, and Akers, L K, 1967, Recent improvements in benzene chemistry for radiocarbon dating: Geochim et Cosmochim Acta, v 31, p 1094–1096.Google Scholar
Noakes, J E, Kim, S M, and Stipp, J J, 1965, Chemical and counting advances in liquid scintillation age dating: 6th internatl conf on radiocarbon and tritium dating, Proc, USAEC conf—650652, Pullman, Washington.Google Scholar
Polach, H A and Stipp, J J, 1967, Improved synthesis techniques for methane and benzene radiocarbon dating: Jour Appl Radiation and Isotopes, v 18, p 359–364.Google Scholar
Shane, O C III, 1967, The Mixter site, in: Prufer, and McKenzie (eds), Studies in Ohio archaeology: Cleveland, Western Reserve Univ Press, p 121–186.Google Scholar
Thomas, J B, 1970, Illinoian-Wisconsin Pleistocene deposits at Eaton, Ohio: Geol Soc America Bull, v 81, p 3433–3436.Google Scholar