Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T21:33:53.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Section 10: Summary and Conclusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

A significant and substantial effort has been made by the 14C community in quality assurance (QA) procedures, of which participation in FIRI is only one part but one that provides an independent and blind check on laboratory performance. The overwhelming willingness to participate is a testament to the importance which laboratories place on quality.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , 2003 , pp. 285 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

REFERENCES FOR FIRI, SECTIONS 1–10

Bland, JM, Altman, DG. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet (i):307–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BS5497. The organisation of collaborative trials. British Standards Institute.Google Scholar
Gulliksen, S, Scott, EM. 1995. TIRI report. Radiocarbon 37(2):820–1.Google Scholar
Hogg, AG, Higham, T, Robertson, S, Beukens, R, Kankainen, T, McCormac, FG, van der Plicht, J, Stuiver, M. 1995. Radiocarbon age assessment of a new, near background IAEA 14C quality assurance material. Radiocarbon 37(2):797–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISG. 1982. An interlaboratory comparison of radiocarbon measurements in tree rings. Nature 198:619–23.Google Scholar
Long, A, Kalin, RM. 1990. A suggested quality assurance protocol for radiocarbon dating laboratories. Radiocarbon 32(3):329–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangerud, J, Svendsen, JI, Astakhov, VI. 1999. Age and extent of the Barents and Kara ice sheets in Northern Russia. BOREAS 28(1):46–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polach, H. 1989. 14Care. Radiocarbon 31(3):422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozanski, K, Stichler, W, Gonfiantini, R, Scott, EM, Beukens, RP, Kromer, B, van der Plicht, J. 1992. The IAEA 14C intercomparison exercise 1990. Radiocarbon 34(3):506–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, EM, Aitchison, TC, Harkness, DD, Cook, GT, Baxter, MS. 1990. An overview of all three stages of the international radiocarbon intercomparison. Radiocarbon 32(3):309–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, EM, Harkness, DD, Miller, BF, Cook, GT, Baxter, MS. 1992. Announcement of a further international intercomparion exercise. Radiocarbon 34(3):528–32.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Harkness, DD, Cook, GT. 1998. Interlaboratory comparisons: lessons learned. Radiocarbon 40(1): 331–43.Google Scholar
Sementsov, AA, Zaitseva, GI, Gorsdorf, J, Nagler, A, Parzinger, H, Bokovenko, NA, Chugunov, KV, Lebedeva, LM. 1998. Chronology of the burial finds from Scythian monuments in southern Siberia and Central Asia. Radiocarbon 40(1):713–21.Google Scholar
Wilson, SR, Ward, GK. 1981. Evaluation and clustering of radiocarbon age determinations: procedures and paradigms. Archaeometry 23(1):19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar