No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Simple Pretreatment Method Development for Iron and Calcium Carbonate Samples
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 July 2016
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Since iron artifacts generally contain trace amounts of carbon, an iron sample needs to be relatively large, as compared to other materials, and a specially designed combustion system is required. An elemental analyzer (EA) was used for the combustion of iron without any special chemical treatment. CO2 gas with 1 mg of carbon was obtained from the combustion of an iron artifact by using an EA and reduced to graphite for accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) measurement. In this work, AMS dating results done at the Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) for several ancient iron artifacts are presented and compared with independently estimated ages. This method was found to be useful for the pretreatment of iron artifacts that contained >0.1% carbon. A simple pretreatment method using an EA was also applied to calcium carbonate (CaCO3) samples. Samples were preheated overnight at 100–300 °C, without any special chemical treatment. This removed modern CO2 contamination and the background level decreased to a comparable value measured in samples treated with phosphoric acid under vacuum.
Information
- Type
- Sample Preparation
- Information
- Radiocarbon , Volume 52 , Issue 3: 20th Int. Radiocarbon Conference Proceedings , 2010 , pp. 1295 - 1300
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2010 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona
References
Cheoun, MK, Kang, J, Song, YM, Kim, JC, Kim, IC, Park, JH, Youn, MY. 2001. Pretreatment of iron artifacts and bone at SNU-AMS. Journal of the Korean Physical Society
39(4):796–8.Google Scholar
Cook, AC, Wadsworth, J, Southon, JR. 2001. AMS radiocarbon dating of ancient iron artifacts: a new carbon extraction method in use at LLNL. Radiocarbon
43(2A):221–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cresswell, RG. 1991. The radiocarbon dating of iron artifacts using accelerator mass spectrometry. Historical Metallurgy
25(2):76–85.Google Scholar
Cresswell, RG. 1992. Radiocarbon dating of iron artifacts. Radiocarbon
34(3):898–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, JC, Park, JH, Kim, IC, Lee, C, Cheoun, MK, Kang, J, Song, YM, Jeong, SC. 2001. Progress and protocol at the Seoul National University AMS Facility. Journal of the Korean Physical Society
39(4):778–82.Google Scholar
Yoneda, M, Shibata, Y, Tanaka, A, Uehiro, T, Morita, M, Uchida, M, Kobayashi, T, Kobayashi, C, Suzuki, R, Miyamoto, K, Hancock, B, Dibden, C, Edmonds, JS. 2004. AMS 14C measurement and preparative techniques at NIES-TERRA. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B
223–224:116–23.Google Scholar
Nakamura, T, Hirasawa, M, Igaki, K. 1995. AMS radiocarbon dating of ancient oriental iron artifacts at Nagoya University. Radiocarbon
37(2):629–36.Google Scholar
Scharf, A, Kretschmer, W, Morgenroth, G, Uhl, T, Kritzler, K, Hunger, K, Pernicka, E. 2004. Radiocarbon dating of iron artifacts at the Erlangen AMS facility. Radiocarbon
46(1):175–80.Google Scholar
van der Merwe, NJ, Stuiver, M. 1968. Dating iron by the carbon-14 method. Current Anthropology
9(1):48–53.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE. 1987. Catalyst and binder effects in the use of filamentous graphite for AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B
29(1–2):50–6.Google Scholar
You have
Access
- 8
- Cited by