Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T06:13:21.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Systematic Bias of Radiocarbon Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Adam Walanus
Adam Walanus*
Affiliation:
Department of Geoinformatics, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland. Email: walanus@geol.agh.edu.pl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Systematic bias of dates can became statistically significant regarding the growing global number of dates connected with the calibration curve plateau. For example, samples of true age in the span 800–700 BC are dated to be roughly 100 younger, on average. The curve of expected bias for a given age is presented. To avoid such a bias, the Bayesian paradigm probably must be modified in some way.

Information

Type
14C Chronologies, Dendrochronology, Wiggle-Matching, and Calibration Tools
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , 2009, pp. 433 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Buck, CE, Cavanagh, WG, Litton, CD. 1996. The Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Archaeological Data. Chichester: Wiley. 402 p.Google Scholar
Guilderson, TP, Reimer, PJ, Brown, TA. 2005. The boon and bane of radiocarbon dating. Science 307(5708):362–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michczyńska, DJ, Pazdur, MF, Walanus, A. 1989. Bayesian approach to probabilistic calibration of radiocarbon ages. PACT 29:69–79.Google Scholar
Michczyńska, DJ, Michczyński, A, Pazdur, A. 2007. Frequency distribution of radiocarbon dates as a tool for reconstructing environmental changes. Radiocarbon 49(2):799–806.Google Scholar
Michczyński, A. 2007. Is it possible to find a good point estimate of a calibrated radiocarbon date? Radiocarbon 49(2):393–401.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1029–58.Google Scholar
Robert, CP, Casella, G. 2004. Monte Carlo Statistical Methods. 2nd edition. New York: Springer-Verlag. 645 p.Google Scholar
Steier, P, Rom, W, Puchegger, S. 2001. New methods and critical aspects in bayesian mathematics for 14C calibration. Radiocarbon 43(2A):373–80.Google Scholar
Stolk, AD, Hogervorst, K, Berendsen, H. 1989. Correcting 14C histograms for the non-linearity of the radiocarbon time scale. Radiocarbon 31(2):169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar