Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T12:32:39.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simulation and experimental verificationof dosedistributions of electron beams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2012

J. Šemnická and
J. Klusoň
J. Šemnická
Affiliation:
Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Brehova 7, Prague 1, 115 19, Czech RepublicNa Homolce Hospital, Medical Physics Department, Roentgenova 37/2, Prague 5, 150 00, Czech Republic
J. Klusoň
Affiliation:
Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Brehova 7, Prague 1, 115 19, Czech Republic
Get access

Abstract

Accurate dose calculations are very important in radiotherapytreatment planning. The Monte Carlo method has proven to be an accurateand reliable method for simulation of the dose distributions fromelectron beams and can provide theoretically more accurate distributionsthan conventional planning system algorithms (e.g. theGeneralized Gaussian Pencil Beam algorithm) for more complex targetconfigurations. The aim of this work was to assess the parametersand spectrum of a given electron beam (Varian CLINAC 2100 C/D) from experimentaldepth dose distribution and then simulate dose distributions inan experimental arrangement with a 3D polymer gel dosimeter. Thecomparison of data from experimental measurements, Monte Carlo calculationsand the planning system enabled us to verify experimentally thesimulation model and technique as well as the planning system results. Bothsimple and more complex systems (e.g. dose distributions closeto different material interfaces) can be studied. The generationand influence of the “bremsstrahlung” photons in the electron beamswas also analyzed using the simulation technique. The computations,experimental methods used and results obtained are presented anddiscussed.

Keywords

Monte Carlo simulationelectron beams3D gel dosimetrytreatment planning systems

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Radioprotection , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , January 2012, pp. 79 - 91
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahnesjö A. (2010) Beam characterization and dose modelling for electron beams, ESTRO Teaching Course on Dose Modelling and Verification for External Beam Radiotherapy, Seville, Spain, 14-18 March 2010.
Hyödynmaa S. (1991) Implementations of the generalized Gaussian pencil beam algorithm for three-dimensional electron beam dose planning, Espoo: Technical Research Centre of Finland. ISBN 951-38-3943-5.
Jette, D. et al. (1988) Electron dose calculation using multiple-scattering theory. A: Gaussian multiple-scattering theory. Med. Phys. 15 (2), 123-137.Google ScholarPubMed
Lax, I. et al. (1983) Electron beam dose planning using Gaussian beams. Improved radial dose profiles, Acta Radiol. Suppl. 364, 49-59.Google ScholarPubMed
Low, D.A. et al. (1998) A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions, Med. Phys. 25 (5), 656-661.Google ScholarPubMed
Novotny, J. et al. (2001) Energy and dose rate dependence of BANG-2 polymer-gel dosimeter, Med. Phys. 28 (8), 2379-2387.Google ScholarPubMed
Novotny, J. Jr. et al. (2002) Quality control of the stereotactic radiosurgery procedure with the polymer-gel dosimetry, Radiotherapy and Oncology, 63 (6), 223-230.Google ScholarPubMed
Pelowitz D.B. et al. (2005) MCNPXTM 2.5.0, Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code System for Multiparticle and High Energy Applications, LA-CP-05-0369 (2005).
Wei, J. et al. (2007) Reconstruction of electron spectra from depth doses with adaptive regularization, Med. Phys. 33 (2), 354-359. Google ScholarPubMed
Zhu, T.C. et al. (2001) Characteristics of bremsstrahlung in electron beams, Med. Phys. 28 (7), 1352-1358.Google ScholarPubMed