Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-jswmv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T21:08:24.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Easy lambda-terms are not always simple

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

Alberto Carraro
Affiliation:
DAIS, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, via Torino 155, 30172 Mestre, Italy. acarraro@dsi.unive.it, salibra@dsi.unive.itPPS, Université Paris Diderot, 175 rue de Chevaleret, 75013 Paris, France
Antonino Salibra
Affiliation:
DAIS, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, via Torino 155, 30172 Mestre, Italy. acarraro@dsi.unive.it, salibra@dsi.unive.it

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

A closed λ-term M is easy if, for anyother closed term N, the lambda theory generated byM = N is consistent. Recently, it has been introduceda general technique to prove the easiness of λ-terms through thesemantical notion of simple easiness. Simple easiness implies easiness and allows to proveconsistency results via construction of suitable filter models ofλ-calculus living in the category of complete partial orderings: givena simple easy term M and an arbitrary closed term N, itis possible to build (in a canonical way) a non-trivial filter model which equates theinterpretation of M and N. The question whether easinessimplies simple easiness constitutes Problem 19 in the TLCA list of open problems. In thispaper we negatively answer the question providing a non-empty co-r.e. (complement of arecursively enumerable) set of easy, but not simple easy, λ-terms.