Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-w5jd6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-03T13:16:13.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Humans, Computers and Wizards, Analysing human (simulated) computer interactionR. Wooffitt, N. M. Fraser, N. Gilbert and S. McGlashan Routledge, 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE1997, ISBN 0-415-06948-3, Price: approx £50

Review products

Humans, Computers and Wizards, Analysing human (simulated) computer interaction R. Wooffitt, N. M. Fraser, N. Gilbert and S. McGlashan Routledge, 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE1997, ISBN 0-415-06948-3, Price: approx £50

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Angel de Vicente
Angel de Vicente
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Book-Reviews
Information
ReCALL , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , November 1998 , pp. 80 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Fox, B. A. (1993) ‘The Human Tutorial Dialogue Project: Issues in the Design of Instructional Systems’ Computers, Cognition, and Work. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1983) ‘Two explorations of the organization of overlapping talk in conversation’ Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature, 28. Tilburg: Tilburg UniversityGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. (1974) ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation’ Language 50, 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar