Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T03:20:14.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CALL Systems

LICE: An Intelligent Tutoring System to Assist Writing in German

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Chris Bowerman
Chris Bowerman
Affiliation:
UMIST
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The history of computer-aided language learning (CALL) dates back some 40 years. During this period two main types of system have been developed: frame-based and intelligent. These two types of programs are examined in turn below.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
ReCALL , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , November 1990 , pp. 9 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bacla, D, French Grammar Analyser, AISB conference on AI and education,University of Exeter,2–3 September 1985.Google Scholar
Brent, R & Jarvis, R, An AI Approach to Natural Language teaching, AI Proceedings, 3rd Australian computer science conference,Canberra,January 1986.Google Scholar
Comett, C, What You Should Know About Teaching and Learning Styles, Phi Delta Kappa Fastback 191,1983, pp 1–52.Google Scholar
Dowty, D, Wall, R & Peters, S, Introduction to Montague Semantics, Dordrecht Reidel, Holland, 1981.Google Scholar
Elsom-Cook, M, ‘Artificial intelligence and computer aided instruction’ in CITE Report No.4, Open University, 1986.Google Scholar
Emanuelli, A, ‘Al and CALL’ in UEA Papers in Linguistics (ed. Fox, J), Special Issue, June 1986, pp. 43–56.Google Scholar
Farrington, B, A Micro-computer Program for Checking Translation at Sentence Level, The Language Laboratory, University of Aberdeen, 1983.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G, Klein, E, Pullum, K & Sag, I, Generalised Phrase Structure Grammar, Basil Blackwell Oxford, 1985.Google Scholar
Jones, C, Fortescue, S, Using Computers in the Classroom, Longman, 1987.Google Scholar
Klein, W, Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezek, G, ‘Intelligent Tutoring Systems and ICAT’ in The Computing Teacher, 15(6), 1988, pp.11–43.Google Scholar
Krahnke, K, ‘Approaches to Syllabus Design for Foreign Language Teaching’ in Theory & Practice, No.67, ERIC document ED 283385, ERIC Clearing House on Languages and Linguistics, Washington DC, 1987.Google Scholar
Krahnke, K, Christison, M, ‘Recent Language Research and Some Language Teaching Principles’ in TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 1985, pp 625–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J, Rogers, T, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching: a Description and Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Sells, P, Contemporary Linguistic Theories, Centre for Study of Language and Information, Stanford, US, 1985.Google Scholar
Weischedel, R, Voge, W & Jarvis, M, ‘An Al Approach to Language Instruction’ in Al, 10, 1978, pp. 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E, Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring: Computational Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge, Morgan Kaufmann Los Altos, California, 1987.Google Scholar
Yazdani, M, ‘The Ideal Teaching Machine’ in Cameron, K, Dodd, W & Rahtz, S, Computers & Modern Language Studies, Ellis Horwood, 1987.Google Scholar
Yazdani, M, Lawler, R, Al and Education Vol 1: Learning Environments and Tutoring Systems, Ablex Norwood, New Jersey, 1987.Google Scholar