Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-7drmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T07:34:21.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Évaluation et multimédia dans l’apprentissage d’une L2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2004

MICHEL LAURIER
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, University of Montreal, PO Box 6132, Stn Centreville, Montréal (Quebec), Canada Michel.d.laurier@umontreal.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

In the first part of this paper different areas where technology may be used for second language assessment are described. First, item banking operations, which are generally based on Item Response Theory but not necessarily restricted to dichotomously scored items, facilitate assessment task organization and require technological support. Second, technology may help to design more authentic assessment tasks or may be needed in some direct testing situations. Third, the assessment environment may be more adapted and more stimulating when technology is used to give the student more control. The second part of the paper presents different functions of assessment. The monitoring function (often called formative assessment) aims at adapting the classroom activities to students and to provide continuous feedback. Technology may be used to train the teachers in monitoring techniques, to organize data or to produce diagnostic information; electronic portfolios or quizzes that are built in some educational software may also be used for monitoring. The placement function is probably the one in which the application of computer adaptive testing procedures (e.g. French CAPT) is the most appropriate. Automatic scoring devices may also be used for placement purposes. Finally the certification function requires more valid and more reliable tools. Technology may be used to enhance the testing situation (to make it more authentic) or to facilitate data processing during the construction of a test. Almond et al. (2002) propose a four component model (Selection, Presentation, Scoring and Response) for designing assessment systems. Each component must be planned taking into account the assessment function.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press