Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T07:37:06.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two conceptions of learning and their implications for CALL at the tertiary level

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Mike Levy
Mike Levy
Affiliation:
The University of Queensland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Though it may not be expressed explicitly, any CALL design reflects a particular conception of teaching and learning. A broad division may be made between learning that focuses on the individual learner, and learning that emphasises social interaction. The first orientation is represented by the work of Piaget, whose conception of learning is individualistic, whereas Vygotsky is the prime example of a theoretician who has focused on social factors. The two perspectives imply widely differing classroom practices, research agendas and techniques. This paper will detail the theoretical underpinnings of the two approaches, and will explore their implications as they relate to research and practice in CALL, with a particular focus on the tertiary level.

Information

Type
Selected Papers
Information
ReCALL , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , May 1998 , pp. 86 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, Anderson, Reder, L.M. and Simon, H.A. (1996) ‘Situated learning and education’, Educational Researcher, 25 (4), 5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barson, J. (1997) ‘Space, time and form in the project-based foreign language classroom‘. In Gassin, R., Gassin, J. and Smith, M. (eds.), Language learning through social computing, Occasional Papers Number 16, Melbourne: ALAA and the Horwood Language Centre, 1–38Google Scholar
Barson, J. and Debski, R. (1996) ‘Calling back CALL: technology in the service of foreign language learning based on creativity, contingency, and goal-oriented activity’. In Warschauer, M. (ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning, Hawaii: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Centre, 49–68Google Scholar
Boyle, T. (1997) Design for multimedia learning, London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1985) ‘Vygotsky: a historical and conceptual perspective’. In Wertsch, J. V. (ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–32Google Scholar
Crook, C. (1991) ‘Computers in the zone of proximal development: implications for evaluation’, Educational Computing, 17 (1), 6–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debski, R. (1997) ‘Support of creativity and collaboration in the language classroom: a new role for technology’. In Debski, R., Gassin, J. and Smith, M. (eds.), Language learning through social computing. Occasional Papers Number 16, Melbourne: ALAA and the Horwood Language Centre, 39–66Google Scholar
Debski, R., Gassin, J. and Smith, M. (eds.) (1997) Language learning through social computing, Occasional Papers Number 16, Melbourne: ALAA and the Horwood Language Centre.Google Scholar
Goodfellow, R. (1995) ‘A review of the types of CALL programs for vocabulary instruction’, Computer Assisted Language Learning 8 (2–3), 205–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gremmo, M.-J. and Riley, P. (1995) ‘Autonomy, self-direction and self-access in language teaching and learning’. System 23 (2), 151–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, C. (1996) Writing technology: studies on the materiality of literacy, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hamburger, H. (1995) ‘Tutorial tools for language learning by two-medium dialogue’. In Holland, V. M., Kaplan, J. D. and Sams, M. R. (eds.), Intelligent language tutors: theory shaping technology, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 183–200Google Scholar
Harrington, M. (1996) ‘Intelligent computerassisted language learning’, On-CALL, 10 (3), 2–9Google Scholar
Hartog, R. (1989) ‘Computer-assisted learning – from process control paradigm to information resource paradigm’. Journal of Microcomputer Applications, 12, 15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, J. (1982) The Grammarland Principle’, Bulletin Pedagogique, 80–1 (44–5), 49–53Google Scholar
Holland, V. M., Kaplan, J. D. and Sams, M. R. (eds.) (1995) Intelligent language tutors: theory shaping technology, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jones, A. (1993) ‘Theories of learning and information technology’. In Scrimshaw, P. (ed.), Language, classrooms and computers, London: Routledge, 11–26Google Scholar
Kenning, M.-M. and Kenning, M. J. (1990) Computers and language learning: current theory and practice. New York: Horwood.Google Scholar
Kern, R. (1996) ‘Computer-mediated communication: using email exchanges to explore personal histories in two cultures’. In Warschauer, M. (ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning, Hawaii: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Centre, 105–119Google Scholar
Laurillard, D. and Marullo, G. (1993) ‘Computerbased approaches to second language learning’. In Scrimshaw, P. (ed.), Language, classrooms and computers, London: Routledge, 145–165Google Scholar
Levy, M. (1997) Computer-assisted language learning: context and contextualization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, P. (1993) ‘Collaborative learning with computers’. In Scrimshaw, P. (ed.). Language, classrooms and computers, London: Routledge, 40–56Google Scholar
McDonell, W. (1992) ‘Language and cognitive development through cooperative group work’. In Kessler, C. (ed.), Cooperative language learning, London: Prentice Hall, 51–64Google Scholar
Papert, S. (1980) Mindstorms, London: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. C. (1995) ‘The good, the bad, and the ugly: the many faces of constructivism’. Educational Researcher, 24 (7), 5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1980) ‘The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance’. In Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (ed.), Language and learning Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Renté, D. and Chanier, T. (1995) ‘Collaboration and computer-assisted acquisition of a second language’', Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(1), 3–29Google Scholar
Scrimshaw, B. (ed.) (1993) Language, classrooms and computers, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shneiderman, B. (1997) ‘Forward’. In Debski, R., Gassin, J. and Smith, M. (eds.). Language learning through social computing, Occasional Papers Number 16, Melbourne: ALAA and the Horwood Language Centre.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1954) ‘The science of learning and the art of teaching’. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97Google Scholar
Tella, S.(1992) Talking shop via email: a thematic and linguistic analysis of electronic mail communication (Research Report No. 99), Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Teacher Education.Google Scholar
Tomlin, R. S. (1995) ‘Modelling individual tutorial interactions: theoretical and empirical bases of ICALL’. In Holland, V. M., Kaplan, J. D. and Sams, M. R. (eds.). Intelligent language tutors: theory shaping technology, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 221–242Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986) Thought and language, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M.(ed.) (1995a) Computer-mediated collaborative learning: theory and practice. NFLRC Research Notes 17. Hawaii: Second Language Teaching μ Curriculum Centre.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (ed.) (1995b) Virtual connections: online activities and projects for networking language learners, Hawaii: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Centre.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (ed.) (1996) Telecollaboration in foreign language learning, Hawaii: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Centre.Google Scholar