Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T08:41:32.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Views of Religious Certitude

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Stephen Maitzen
Stephen Maitzen
Affiliation:
Sage School of Philosophy, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.y. 14853
Get accessRights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At least since Cardinal Newman's Grammar of Assent (1870), Anglo-American philosophers have been concerned with the role of certitude, or subjective epistemic certainty, in theistic belief. Newman is himself famous for holding that certitude is an essential feature of any sort of genuine belief, including in particular religious belief. As one recent commentator, Michael Banner, notes, for Newman

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 1992, pp. 65 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Alston, William P. ‘Level Confusions in Epistemology’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, v (1980), 135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banner, Michael C.The Justification of Science and the Rationality of Religious Belief. Oxford: Clarendon Press (1990).Google Scholar
Gutting, Gary.Religious Belief and Religious Skepticism. University of Notre Dame Press (1982).Google Scholar
Newman, John Henry.. ‘An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent’, in Gerald D. McCarthy (ed.), The Ethics of Belief Debate. Scholars Press (1986).Google Scholar
Stephen, James Fitzjames. ‘On Certitude in Religious Assent’, in McCarthy (op. cit.), pp. 147–69.Google Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. ‘Faith and Goodness’, in Godfrey Vesey (ed.), The Philosophy in Christianity. Cambridge University Press (1990), pp. 167–91.Google Scholar