Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T19:40:46.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Concepts, anti-concepts and religious experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Sallie B. King
Affiliation:
Department of Religion, Temple University, Pennsylvania

Extract

The linguistic expression of religious experience is problematic for both the experiencer and the philospher. For instance: is the religious experience nonverbal, i.e. does it utterly transcend all words, concepts, and thought? Or is it ineffable – not amenable to verbal expression? In either case, what can one make of all the talk and writings of those who do report religious experiences? The frequent references to ineffability, transcendence of thought and the like, lead one to wonder if the experiencers themselves are not dis-satisfied with these expressions. If this is indeed the case, what is it about these expressions that produces this dissatisfaction? Are some expressions better suited to the experience than others?

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable